Obviously I'm not talking about preferring they didn't have him at all, just pointing out there's real downside here. Absolutely, and I don't think anyone preferred that he sign a MLB deal. But as a cost of doing business? I don't think there's a ton of risk involved. As Kyle mentions, if you're left with a tough choice on rostering him, then odds are he hasn't developed as hoped and he's just a long reliever without dynamite stuff. In which case, it's really not a decision of much importance. If he's 22/23 and not quite up to snuff yet it doesn't mean he's just somebody you'd willingly toss aside.