Agreed. While MASN airs all the games of both teams, evenly split between MASN and MASN 2, except for the few games picked up by national networks. Yes Angelos owns the O's and MASN, but still all the Nats games are broadcast, and done so with a level of production quality similiar to other regional sports networks. The problem is: no one watches. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/07/07/ST2008070702853.html This article from last July shows the disparity - The Nats ranked 30th in TV ratings, and averaged less than 1/3 the audience of the 29th ranked Royals (9,000 to 28,000). Simply wretched. Somehow MASN sees fit to air 8 "different" supplemental programs about the Ravens, but not one show about the Nats. Their sports talk radio simulcasts feature just Baltimore personalities and the spend about 15 minutes talking O's for every 1 minute talking Nats. If they want to actually build a fanbase, they need actual coverage beyond the game, and pre and post shows. Let people get to know the players. There is no established history with the Nats; no legacies like Cal, Eddie, Brooks, or Palmer to fall back on and try to to distract fans that the current team sucks out loud. So their job is that much harder than the O's. All the other reasons about Washington seem valid enough. It's a divided city. Lots of poor people who can't afford and/or don't care enough to get on the bandwagon, and lots of wealthy, often part-time residents who probably have other allegiances and aren't going to start rooting for a loser like the Nats. Having spent last season sitting through 4 or 5 Nats games a week (not by choice but at work, mind you) I must say that team is VERY hard to watch, and I don't see their situation changing anytime soon.