Your argument is that you get bored with daily changes by July, so others shouldn't be allowed to, and mine doesn't hold water? My argument is that only allowing roster changes in a very limited window is arbitrary and unfair. I don't see any reason why I, or anybody else, should be locked into a roster decision made days in advance. I just don't see the point. And since most people have voted for some sort of ability to change more frequently than once a week, I think others agree with me. FYI: The "not honest" comment was in regards to the idea that since you can set your lineups months in advance, it doesn't matter how frequently you get access to that. That's akin to suggesting we all set our lineups today and leave them the same way for the rest of the season. And what about people who ended up with a bad roster when they were away for the draft? If somebody has 3 good outfielders who can play everyday, but another person's OF is weak and needs a platoon to contend, why can't that person choose to platoon as the season goes on. This seems to doubly reward people who had a better draft, and I at least didn't even see this rule until after the draft. no, my argument is that other people get bored and that hurts the competition. the roster deadline is not arbitrary because you set your roster for each game on the day before the game begins. hence for each game (one week) you have a set lineup. makes perfect sense.