BigSlick
-
Posts
17,995 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
4
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by BigSlick
-
I dunno if they're just shrugging their shoulders and are like 'fine, this back up Guard will be our center, whatever' or if they're planning things in the draft, but it is troubling. Especially in a year where we saw Center horsefeathers-ups really weigh heavily in games - Bears games obviously, but also very notably in the College playoff and in the Super Bowl. A good center is important!!
-
I wonder if that indicates Bowers is not someone they're really looking for at 9
-
I think the Bears really need to find at least one legit FA veteran receiver because with 4 picks after 1...you can't fill this WR corps to serious standards.
-
Dang, thats an impressive amount of money for Mooney who had a really rough year (but after a pretty solid career in a bad offensive environment)
-
We can’t possibly know, but that’s a strange conclusion to come to when Poles is the guy who utterly fleeced the Panthers last year. The signs point mostly to the rest of the league being uninterested in Fields as a starter. This should tell us something.
-
Make Fun of the Bears' Stadium Woes in Here
BigSlick replied to Outshined_One's topic in Other Sports
I have no idea what *actually* is going to happen, but I'm now mildly disappointed it wont be in Arlington Heights because it's an easier transit for me now. -
I don't think the Bears are gonna settle on sticking with Fields because the market is so bad for him they can't get anything for him. That wouldn't make any sense. You stick with an asset because everyone else think it's a bad asset? It would be high-larious if they trade him to Minnesota and he ends up incredible. It's a risk I'd be willing to take, of course.
-
I'm ok with spending a little bit on RB. Typically i'm not for putting a lot of money into this position but they're gonna be a run heavy team and Herbert has dropped a bit in my estimation. Roschon seems promising but not a real workhorse back. Plus we have unlimited cap space so, whatever. But make sure to allocate some money on some horsefeathers Lineman, god damn.
-
With Poles locking down Jaylon for the next 4 years, I have to say, I’m feeling more and more pleased with how he’s operated as a General Manager. Obviously, he’s gonna be defined by this next draft and what he does at the QB position, but aside from a few slip ups (Velus Jones, the wide-receiver-who-must-not-be-named trade) he’s made a lot of prudent, sober moves, locked up the best talent from previous administrations, and maximized his assets. 2024 is a huge pivot point but he has my confidence at the moment.* *I fully expect this post to be quoted in 5 years as the team is moribund and futureless
-
the fact that Denver is paying 85 million dollars to make Russell Wilson go away makes it so utterly embarrassing he led a 21 point comeback against the Bears last year.
-
If you make your money in the Information Economy in any way (writing, social media, streaming etc) you are incentivized to find out what the status quo opinion is and to release something provocative or inflammatory. If it looks like the consensus opinion is that "Caleb Williams is pretty good and seems to have no issues going to the Bears" you have to figure out a way to generate clicks, and outrage is one way to do it.
-
This is the same thing I'm feeling when I look at JJ McCarthy
-
Here's hoping the McCaskey's have zero hearing at all when it comes to football decisions right now
-
This is actually very easily accounted for: Last 20 QBs drafted first Bryce Young (lol) Kenny Pickett Trevor Lawrence Joe Burrow Kyler Murray Baker Mayfield Mitchell Trubisky (woof) Jared Goff Jameis Winston (the best in a bad class) Blake Bortles 🤷♂️ EJ Manuel (I legitimately have no idea who this is) Andrew Luck Cam Newton Sam Bradford 🤷♂️ Matthew Stafford Matt Ryan (tough competition with Joe Flacco) JaMarcus Russell (horrible but also there isn't an NFL quality QB in this draft) Vince Young Alex Smith (Aaron Rodgers definitely bests Smith here, but Smith isn't a bad consolation prize) Eli Manning 🤷♂️ Ok - going through the list, I'd say in roughly 10 of these drafts the correct QB was taken first. (There's some argument to be made in some years, like, in 2004, between Eli Manning, Ben Roethlisberger and Phillip Rivers, who do I want? Rivers is the best overall passer but am I upset to end up with Manning and 2 Super Bowls? I dunno) ((There are also years where there's no good option, like 2010 - Bradford vs. Tebow, Jimmy Clausen, Colt McCoy and Mike Kafka. Woof.)) I put this out there to say that it's not as much of a crapshoot as it may seem - or at the very least, it's a weighted crapshoot. You give yourself decidedly better odds with the 1st overall.
-
This is the only time I'll say this type of thing - I don't trust the Bears to find the diamond in the rough QB. I'd rather they just settle on the consensus best QB in the draft. They've not shown the ability to get *that* right in history, but they SURE as hell haven't shown the ability to find a steal QB prospect. Just get the guy everyone is pretty sure is really good. I absolutely love #assets but at a certain point its outsmarting yourself
-
It's unavoidable - Williams would get that kind of cult-like love for any QB prospect a team drafting a QB would get - hell, I watched Panthers fans desperately try to defend Bryce Young's potential all year long. People are gonna hold out hope for their guy. It's all the worse for Bears fans because we have literally not one had a guy you can say, with complete confidence, is an elite QB. And until we get one of those guys, our brains will remain broken.
-
alright friends, i guess i should pay attention to the 2024 Cubs now
-
2016 World Series Game 7 watch-along with Maddon/Francona
BigSlick replied to Irrelevant Dude's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
I was watching game 7 at the Holiday Club with some friends of mine. When Rajai Davis tied it off Chapman, I walked right out of the bar, into the rain, and onto the Red Line (I lived in Rogers Park at the time). I simply couldn't watch what was happening. I listened to the game on the radio while going up north, got back into my apartment right when the 10th inning was starting and got to see Ben Zobrist take the lead. That game DEFINITELY took years off my life. But I also got to watch one of my favorite teams win a championship, so there's that. -
I don't think thats quite true - or at least, there's wiggle room there. If Williams is adequate, good or very good, and the team around him is very good, Poles will be fine. If Williams is amazing and the team around him is bad, Poles could very well be in trouble. (A QB being amazing and the team itself being bad is a bit of an exceptional situation because its very likely the team will at least be OK if he's amazing, just by virtue of his play, but it can happen)
-
Just for the record, I'll just say I'll be perfectly content if we're a 2020s Bills where we're consistently great and lose in the playoffs This would be a significant upgrade over where the Bears have been for the past 25 years
-
Legitimately feel bad for Fields. He's probably gonna have to wait another month or so, but it'll be over soon, man.
-
I would say its likely a lot easier to build a team around a guy who's a rung below Mahomes (Thinking about Lamar, Josh Allen, Burrow, Herbert, etc.) who even takes a 50 mill/yr salary hit with young talent you get from the draft on first year deals than it is to build the team and hope you strike gold with a Purdy. The other thing about those guys, is it keeps your window open for a long time - you might get several bites at the apple over a 10+ year career while your roster rises and falls, whereas if you do the SF thing, everything has to line up perfectly contract, development, aging, and then it passes.
-
As someone who's only paid intermittent attention to the NFL between the Cutler years and when Fields was drafted, I'm simply gobsmacked at how much middling starting QBs can get on a contract. The fact that like, $40 mill a year is like, the standard for a Good QB is astronomical to me. But I guess... that's an accurate market if you value QBs where they're supposed to be. I dunno. It's wild. Seeing that Jordan Love is expected to get 40+ mil a year on his contact extension based on (admittedly a very good!) one year of play is wild. (And obviously there are the obvious blunders like Daniel Jones and DeShaun Watson, which will cripple a team for years)
-
It's impossible to know really, there are all sorts of conflicting reports. Some say that Tomlin absolutely loves Fields and wants him https://www.si.com/nfl/steelers/news/pittsburgh-steelers-mike-tomlin-interested-justin-fields All of it is tea leaves reading, unfortunately, until the trades start flying. Its of course in every teams best interest to keep their motives secret and have a bunch of contradictory reports out. But....I am concerned that the market for Fields might not be very strong. Its a great draft for QBs, there are a handful of decent free agent QBs...its not great timing to try to unload him.
-
I will NEVER pay money for some nerd to shout numbers at me
