Maybe it was an "off night" but Higgins was terrible on defense in every facet. Horrible at blocking balls, horrible at throwing out runners, just horrible at...everything. I'm not saying Rucker had a great move, but it was average (again, IMO) and he did his due diligence at keeping runners honest. To be somewhat fair to Higgins he looked much, much better in the games I saw him earlier this year but he was really bad tonight to my uneducated eye. A smarter than your average eastern NC breakdown of the game (not saying much): It was quite hot. Very high humidity. An occasional breeze but generally shitty weather. The type of weather that make people like me wonder why we stay in eastern NC. Also, there were a ton of rednecks again and other than ordering two beers I didn't speak a word to anyone other than some random scout. It was "fireworks night" so there were easily 1,000 kids running around. Rucker: He's short and stocky. Even composure. Was being squeezed in the early stages, perhaps a call or two later in the game went his way. I spoke with a scout (only one I saw around) that was actually a Diamondbacks scout but was scouting for the Rangers (Wood Ducks are TEX affiliate) - is that a thing? It seemed weird but I asked him twice to make sure and he confirmed. Anyway, this scout wasn't (obviously) scouting Rucker because when I introduced myself and asked what Rucker was sitting and/or topping out at and he said "97". I laughed. He assumed I was asking about Jonathan Hernandez of DE but I wasn't and he said "Do you need me to track this guy's speed?". I said "No, but it would be cool if you did and I'd appreciate it". Rucker was 88-92 and sat 90-91 per said scout when I spoke to him a couple innings later. He pitched into some bad luck and I think he got thrown off by the errors. Not a scout's take or anything but he quickly settled down. His offspeed stuff looked solid. He finished quite strong. He certainly did not fade towards the end of his (hot temperature) night - he finished strong and started strong. I was impressed, honestly. He gave up a few hard hit balls, but I was impressed. Again, small sample size alert, I thought he looked much better than Hatch. But a one game sample size amounts to pretty much nothing. Eloy: Dude is a physical specimen. I thought he'd be more Soler (i.e., huge dude that can hit the ball a ton - not so much athlete). He's not obviously a speedster or anything but he was much more athletic than I thought. He laced a double down the line on the (tough) Wood Ducks pitcher in his first at bat. He struck out twice after that and then flied out to pretty much the warning track after that. If anyone can give me easy directions for how to upload a video I have two (one of his double). I asked the ARZ scout about Eloy and he said "we will wait and see" - to which I replied "yeah, but he's pretty impressive" to which he replied "yes, but let's what and see". I suppose on some level we are both right but I hoped he could give me a little more info. But maybe they are just jealous. Other than that the only thing of note was Mitch was kind of good? He got bailed out by two good plays. One by Hodges and one by the SS Monastero (sp?). Monastero is not a good hitter (at least tonight) but I was glad he got that sweet play - it was "javy-ish". He seemed really down on himself when striking out in a big-ish spot.