Meh, ESPN's strength of record says it was harder for UNC to go 11-1 vs. its schedule than it was for Stanford to go 10-2 vs. its schedule. Granted, they are ranked 11 and 12 in the metric, so they are basically equal right now, but once you add in the conference championships, you'd probably see a bigger difference. Sagarin has Stanford at 16 and UNC at 63. Football Outsiders has Stanford 31, UNC 79. Stanford lost to teams ranked in the top-15, UNC lost to a 3-9 team. UNC hasn't even played a team that's currently receiving votes in either poll. Stanford beat No. 9, No. 24 and two teams receiving votes. The top team UNC played according to Sagarin was No. 34 Pitt. Stanford played 7 teams in the top-33. Well yes, but the whole scenario hinges on if UNC beats the consensus #1 in Clemson so some of that would obviously change. I mean I hate UNC and hope they lose so I'm happy to hear arguments why they shouldn't get in even if they do win. And I'm not really advocating they should, either. In fact, the bitching and moaning around here would be glorious in that case.