We are now in the midst of, what, the fifth year of the Hendry era? We have lived through: -4 1/2 offseasons; -4 seasons of mid-season pick-ups; -2 managerial selections; -4 Spring Trainings; and, -4 Cub Conventions; Chicago teams are followed by a number of local papers alone, churning out 100's of articles a year which, either explicitly or implicitly, reveal Hendry's philosophies. At the very least, the vast amounts of available media allow for subjective determinations of what Hendry's philosophies are. However, I for one don't think the man's philosophy is even remotely secret. If posters choose to rely on these rather fertile areas to use there powers of induction, I welcome their contribution to the board. I don't have to agree, but I welcome it. Naked speculation is a funny notion. I don't think inductive reasoning applies. However, speculation that a poster's conclusion or post had no thought behind it is, itself, naked speculation. Is it not?