Is it really fair to assume that Theriot is going to fail like Spencer, Perez, Kevin Maas, or even Jerome Walton? Sometimes, players actually succeed - kinda like Theriot did in 2006 for the Cubs. Should his success surprise us? A pleasant surprise, yes - but we shouldn't be shocked. The only shocking thing about Theriot's performance were the 3 home runs, which were way more than you could have projected for him in 150 at bats. My point is that Theriot has a plan at the plate which is obvious. He is not an easy out, and pitchers are going to have to work to get him out. I find that as a bigger asset than say Ronny Cedeno's lack of production. Theriot is not a free swinger who gets schooled every time he steps up to the plate. He is a player that has actually developed favorably in the Cubs system - and I think he is very possibly a guy who can handle the bat in the 2 hole and score some runs for the Cubs. Since we have DeRosa, who is more accomplished and probably a better overall player - we don't need Theriot at 2B. Since we have Izturis at SS, I think he is better for the team since SS is a defensive position FIRST. If Theriot can play a good SS, I'd like to see him get a shot - but what do the scouting reports say about him at SS?