No Cub had an OBP higher than Dunn's last year, and last year was a bad year for Dunn. Who cares about his batting average? I do. OBP is great and all, but a high OBP doesn't excuse a piss poor batting average. I love guys who can get on base in general, but I also love guys who can hit their way on. A walk is nowhere near as valuable as a hit can be. Agreed. And if Dunn could figure it that there is more to baseball then the LONG homeruns (coughssingles/doubles), his batting average would go up, and OBP would literally reach the level that Bonds was at for the last few yrs. THAT is why Dunn is a pretty solid #5 or 6 hitter, not higher than that. Actually, he'd be an awesome #2 hitter. A lot of people advocate Murton for #2, for example, but Murton hits into double plays at nearly twice the rate of Dunn. I'm convinced that the Dunn-haters don't like him for aesthetic reasons. I know Dunn has hit #2 before (I think I remember him leading off before). He wouldn't be terrible, but I would think that Dunn is FAR from the prototypical #2 hitter, who is difficult to strike out and has exceptional bat control (hit & run, inside out pitches, can bunt). Just think of all the Strike Out/Throw Out he and Pierre would have handed the Cubs should he have been acquired last year, and stuck in the 2 hole (we all know that would have never happened with Neifi/Bynum/Izturis). I think Murton or Theriot would be great #2 hitters. Murton is going to walk, and not K too much. He has great gap power, and seems to have good bat control. Then again, I thought Grace would have been a great 2-hitter, but the one year he hit there he had a career low batting average (.273). We'll see how it shakes out.