Andre Dawson is HOF worthy - and I do not see where the great debate is. Outside of statistics, Dawson was one of the best players of his time. He was a class act, and respected by everyone that I know about. Statistically: * 1977 NL Rookie of the Year. * 1987 NL MVP (on a last place team, which is notable, twice finishing 2nd). * 8 time All-Star. * 8 time Gold Glove winner (6 years in a row - 1980-1985, 87 & 88). * 4 Silver Slugger Awards. * 2774 career hits (#45 ALL TIME). * 1373 career runs (#85 ALL TIME). * 4787 career total bases (#24 ALL TIME). * 503 career doubles (#42 ALL TIME). * 438 career HR (#35 ALL TIME). * 1591 career RBI (#29 ALL TIME). * 314 career SB. * 1039 career extra base hits (#22 ALL TIME). * 118 career sacrifice flies (#9 ALL TIME). * 365.8 career Power/Speed rating (#6 ALL TIME). When you consider ALL of the players honored with induction into the HOF, and recognize that Andre Dawson is amoung the top 35 ALL TIME in categories such as HR, RBI, total bases, xtra base hits, and lump in his 8 Gold Gloves, 8 All-Star appearances - I just don't see where the arguement is, and why Dawson is not already in the HOF.