Time to grow up. You're sounding like an immature high school student. Someone who you just want to punch in the face. I thought CubsBullsBears got banned already. Apparently not. I dont know what I did to be even considered to be banned? Someone has been pushing my buttons over something really stupid. Maybe if that source would stop, I would stop. He is the one bringing up the Weaver thing in seemingly every thread now. Because you are saying you want to punch Vance in the face. Well, I just find it annoying that he would continue to bring up the whole Weaver subject. Its over with. Just drop it. When somebody (and by somebody I mean you) is so obviously wrong and yet refuses to admit they are wrong, it is hard to drop. Either way, you don't say you want to punch another poster. How was I wrong? I am just asking you. I am not trying to push this subject any further. All I said was Weaver was a better pitcher in the post-season than Verlander was, and I would have taken Weaver over Verlander in the playoffs. The way Verlander was pitching in the playoffs, I would have taken alot of other guys over him too. It was just my opinion. I dont see how I could be wrong if that's my judgement. You were right in that aspect but anybody could have looked at the stats before Game 5 and seen that Jeff Weaver had pitched better than Justin Verlander in the 2006 postseason. That's not the issue that people, including myself, have taken exception to. It's the fact that going into the postseason, nobody would have taken Jeff Weaver over Justin Verlander. Nobody. Jeff Weaver sucked this year and was even DFA because of it. He also had no success in the postseason before 2006 (not that 8.1 innings is a good barometer anyway). So there is no evidence out there to show that Jeff Weaver was going to pitch well this postseason. Then you went and said that because of his success in the 2006 postseason, you said that he is a good pitcher which is absolutely ludicrous and wrong. Five postseason starts do not make or break a pitcher. It's called sample size and is basic statistics. He's made 240 starts in his career and has a career ERA+ of 96 which is bad. Three out of the last 4 years he's had an ERA+ under 100, which means he is worse than the league average. His WHIP this year was 1.51. The guy is, flat out, not a good pitcher. And that is what you don't seem to be able to grasp. Weaver just had a horrible year in 06. He was a good pitcher with the Dodgers. He wasnt the staff ace for them, but he didnt have to be. He would be a good 5th starter if he could return to his Dodger form. I believe he can return to that form. He had very little confidence this year, and his stats showed that. He has regained his confidence he had with the Dodgers. If you dont have confidence in yourself to do the task at hand, you're not going to be successful.