who have both won multiple titles since 1917. The Cubs, White Sox, and Red Sox make it 3 teams who have had ridiculously long droughts. 3 is a pretty significant number, especially when over the majority of those years there were far fewer teams in the majors. While the Cubs' drought seems almost too absurd, it hasn't been a fluke occurrence in MLB. okay, since 1945, the red sox have appeared in 5 world series, the white sox, 2. "strange things continue to happen at wrigley field." i don't know why it's so hard to at least admit that there's something strange about all of it, even if you don't believe in curses. And if the Cubs win in the next 10 years, does that mean that there was no curse or that the curse was broken? WS appearances are great and all, but the only thing that counts is the championship. And there were three teams that went through droughts that you would think would be of impossible length. The only strange thing going on at Wrigley is the long, long history of incompetent management. But that's what happens when you've only had a handful of people running the team over the past 90 years. reminds me of a simpson's line for some reason: "there's no mystery about willie. why, he simply disappeared." you seriously haven't noticed anything weird concerning this run of bad luck? as i said, bad management or not, they should have been able to back into the world series since 1945 at some point. hell, the brewers have been to a WS since then. what do the simpsons have to do w/ anything?