That situation is by far the exception to the rule, not the norm. By your standards, baseball is mostly populated by "non-men" who don't take less money because they've been hurt. How is he sabotaging them? You have ridiculous man-love for Prior. Are you his Physical Therapist, or something? I just think the vitriol and hyperbole directed at him is beyond ridiculous. But the euphoric man-love and expected return to the dominance of his career year are somehow less ridiculous? I mean, people are talking about killing animals over this decision. Yeah, that's warranted. I don't know why you expect me to say about those people. The vast majority of the "pro-Prior" posts during all of this have been in regards to the likelyhood of him being able to rebound and perform and the projected monetary costs and how this reflects on the market and the teams needs and resources and alternatives. If you feel that this isn't true and that "euphoric man-love" is actually the most common theme instead, please feel free to show us. I simply have not seen that to generally be the case with only VERY few exceptions to the contrary. The anti-Prior posts, on the other hand, have almost all jumped on him for being "selfish" or "soft" or "weak" and as if he wanted to be paid for not pitching. Yes, there have been some that focused mostly on the economic effects, but most of them jump right to hysterical levels of insulting and emotion that far surpasses any "euphoric man-love." I'm also not sure where you're seeing many people convinced that he would be likely to return to his earlier "dominance." It sounds that most people who wanted him back probably felt that he could still be an effective starter at some point, but that's not the same as assuming he'll be as good as he was at his peak.