Sammy Sofa
-
Posts
98,227 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
208
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Sammy Sofa
-
Let's ask Aramis Fan. -
Yeah, that's pretty damn close. Not a bad take by Fukudome at all.
-
Oh, Castro. You are so swell.
-
What the [expletive] was he trying to do on ball 4? Yeah, I know he can get him out, but it's not like Hill was way off the bag.
-
Koyie Hill is apparently indestructible, at least based on the broken ankle story Bob is telling.
-
Comcast just had him hitting 96. It's really impressive how he hits those speeds with it looking pretty effortless.
-
I fully expect him to be. It seems very Cubs to make sure the rookie pitcher has a veteran defense-oriented catcher behind the dish for his starts. Plus one of the things that Hill was credited for in the offseason was helping Cashner specifically. Eh, if it helps Cashner (or he thinks it helps him) then just schedule Hill's starts for most of Cashner's.
-
I fully expect him to be. It seems very Cubs to make sure the rookie pitcher has a veteran defense-oriented catcher behind the dish for his starts. Plus one of the things that Hill was credited for in the offseason was helping Cashner specifically. The Cubs are getting pretty good swings early. It's also nice to see that after Ramirez was striking out much more than normal during his slump last year he has 0 strikeouts so far this year. Yeah, Aramis was just wretched the first part of last year. He looked awful at the plate. At least so far this year he's getting hits and seeing the ball well.
-
Holy God. What is that, 3 or 4 times Aramis has had one off the bat that looked gone? Frustrating, but it's ideally a sign that big things will come soon and he'll have a good year.
-
How about that opening series between the Indians and White Sox in Cleveland? Sellout opening day and then only about 9,000-10,000 each of the following games.
-
I think we're talking about two different ideas. I'm just saying that when the Cubs suck for a sustained period of time their attendance and ticket sales go down. You're saying that they go down but they're still better off than most other teams. Both things are true.
-
Since you need it spelled out for you, the theory has long been that Wrigley insulates the Cubs from the sort of performance-based attendance cycles you're describing. If that's not so true anymore, it's a story. But that theory doesn't really hold up to close scrutiny. Again, look at long stretches of the 90's, the 80's and the 70's: when the team sucked they didn't sell nearly as many tickets as when they didn't suck. You'd need to compare the impact of performance on attendance relative to every other club in MLB for this theory to hold any water. How the hell did you come to that conclusion? You don't have to look at other teams to know that the Cubs aren't "insulated" from poorer ticket sales and attendance due sustained periods of mediocrity or worse. It's just common sense.
-
That's something I think will definitely have an impact down the line once they're off of WGN altogether.
-
EROTIC.
-
Since you need it spelled out for you, the theory has long been that Wrigley insulates the Cubs from the sort of performance-based attendance cycles you're describing. If that's not so true anymore, it's a story. It's a story. I don't know where the obstinance originates. I don't think one data point early in the season means a whole lot, but I suspect if the Cubs are sub .500 come May there will be plenty of games like yesterday. That's why it's not a story. Who here honestly thought that the Cubs would been drawing near-capacity crowds if they had or with the promise of another mediocre (or worse) year? it's a story because the Cubs coasted through several terrible seasons in the 00's without a noticeable drop in ticket sales. the story is that the sales are finally catching up to the quality of the product Right, but you saw the drop off in attendance in 2006 and 2010 (different than sales, I know).
-
Something tells me that davearm is the type of person who would scoff at anything Soriano does or says in regards to baseball except at times like this.
-
Since you need it spelled out for you, the theory has long been that Wrigley insulates the Cubs from the sort of performance-based attendance cycles you're describing. If that's not so true anymore, it's a story. It's a story. I don't know where the obstinance originates. I don't think one data point early in the season means a whole lot, but I suspect if the Cubs are sub .500 come May there will be plenty of games like yesterday. That's why it's not a story. Who here honestly thought that the Cubs would been drawing near-capacity crowds if they had or with the promise of another mediocre (or worse) year?
-
Deux? More like Part One Million. Hm. Wonder who got it going this time... Kevin Millar Don't deflect, Outlier.
-
Deux? More like Part One Million. Hm. Wonder who got it going this time...
-
Oh boy, Barney and Hill back to back and then the pitcher. That's [expletive] brutal.
-
Since you need it spelled out for you, the theory has long been that Wrigley insulates the Cubs from the sort of performance-based attendance cycles you're describing. If that's not so true anymore, it's a story. But that theory doesn't really hold up to close scrutiny. Again, look at long stretches of the 90's, the 80's and the 70's: when the team sucked they didn't sell nearly as many tickets as when they didn't suck.
-
Nobody struck out or dropped a popup because the lineup wasn't posted early enough, therefore none of this intangible team chemistry crap matters in baseball. Agree or disagree? Those are separate points, silly.
-
That's a weird and incorrect thing to say.
-
It seems like you're being sarcastic, but then I'm not sure since your second sentence is 110% true.
-
Why wouldn't they if the team wasn't winning? Man Passes Out After Holding Breath For Too Long Swimming In Pool Gets A Person Wet Baseball Team Sells Fewer Tickets When It Is Bad Such tales to tell!
