Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,030
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. It was never time to compare him to Jordan. Thankfully it never will be. Don't be ridiculous. He's only 26, and there's been an abundance of reasons to compare him to Jordan since he showed up in the NBA. He is THAT elite.
  2. Are you really saying that Jordan NEVER had a bad 4th quarter in ANY "big game?" Just wanted to specify, because that's a helluva lot different than focusing only on Jordan's Finals performances. I was bored earlier today and if you ranked all of Lebron and Jordan's Finals games by "game score" (not that I know what that means but it's some reductive number) from highest to lowest Lebron would hold 5 of the 7 lowest spots. Of course Lebron had played a total of 8 Finals games compared to Jordan's 35. Yeah, there's no doubt as it stands right now that Jordan is the better Finals performer by far. I was just a bit taken back by someone now declaring that apparently Jordan never had a bad 4th quarter in ANY "big game" he played in.
  3. Are you really saying that Jordan NEVER had a bad 4th quarter in ANY "big game?" Just wanted to specify, because that's a helluva lot different than focusing only on Jordan's Finals performances.
  4. The Mavs are in it because they're a good team lead by an amazing player. Teams were "in it" against Jordan, too, so I'm not exactly sure why the Mavs making it a series would be such damning evidence against LeBron's ability.
  5. That one to Polanco also looked kind of flat - it was actually a pretty good pitch to hit. Yeah, small sample size, but guys seem to be making more good contact with his pitches recently. But hey, Cubs win! Dare we dream of finally seeing the much vaunted winning streak tomorrow? Of course it'll happen against the best rotation in baseball, just to mess with us.
  6. The [expletive] I am. Don't lump us all in with those Fecal League hacks.
  7. Because maybe, the fact that every other 3B in the league is having a very down season is at least a partial explanation for why Aramis has had a down season. You can't ignore a league-wide pratfall in offense and just look at one player's year over year numbers and declare "he declined!". Yes, but it's likely not something specific to 3B. I think what you're saying is that offense in general is down, but it's just more pronounced (for a number of reasons) at 3B, right? Of course, it's league-wide, independent of position. I used his position because it's a lot easier to contextualize 7th of 17 eligible 3B than it is 65th of 204 eligible position players or whatever he is, and because the whole discussion is about either keeping Aramis or replacing him with one of his peers. Right. Just want to make sure it's clear enough for Mr. arm2.
  8. Because maybe, the fact that every other 3B in the league is having a very down season is at least a partial explanation for why Aramis has had a down season. You can't ignore a league-wide pratfall in offense and just look at one player's year over year numbers and declare "he declined!". Yes, but it's likely not something specific to 3B. I think what you're saying is that offense in general is down, but it's just more pronounced (for a number of reasons) at 3B, right?
  9. Because the tract of the discussion was revolving around what Aramis could potentially command if he had a dramatic rebound that ended up with him OPSing over .850. The performance of other people at the position he plays is going to influence how much he'll be able to make next season as a FA. Nobody's saying that there's something exclusive to 3B dragging them down; plenty of teams will look at their options and just assume it was a fluke, but others are going to look at someone like the hypothetically OPSing .850+ Aramis as their best option to improve the position. I don't know why you think that the performance of other people playing the same position wouldn't impact how much money he'd make as a FA if he rebounded that dramatically.
  10. Everyone else will get better. Who knows about Aramis. Are you serious Clark? Of course. Leaguewide numbers for 3Bs are extremely likely to revert toward the mean (i.e., get better). There's nothing specific to being a 3B that's causing a precipitous drop in offensive production (relative to history). The whole notion is preposterous, frankly. Who knows what Aramis' hitting problem is. But it isn't that he stands nearest to 3B when the team is in the field. Wait, you honestly think anyone is arguing that?
  11. In that specific role, sure. But as a whole he's been pretty middle of the pack, as TT pointed out. "Godawful" is pretty melodramatic, especially since we actually saw what a "godawful" Aramis looks like just last year.
  12. I have no doubt someone will throw $10 mil at him, I meant is it worth it to us. IMO the money would be better spent elsewhere. Probably. I'd have little problem with a combo of Baker/DeWitt over there as a stopgap instead of likely overpaying for Aramis.
  13. Just to clarify, any WC change is separate from the two "regular" picks we have post-ASB, correct?
  14. Nobody said it was. One poster brought up whether it was realistic for him to get eight figures if he ended up producing above an .850 OPS. The production of 3B around baseball is going to strongly influence whether that happens or not, so, yes, if he rebounds that much then there's a very good chance he could command at least $10 million next year. And no, he hasn't been "godawful" this year. He hasn't been the power threat they need, especially not for the money he's getting, but he's not "godawful."
  15. Because he hit 20 HR last year and so there's the meatball-y belief (pervasive amongst fans, sports journalists/analysts/hosts AND the Cubs front office) that he could be a decent starting OF.
  16. Yay for my WC HR Derby pick! Booooo for Randy Wells.
  17. When the pitcher is trying to give you an out and apparently can't bunt worth a damn just pitch him a [expletive] strike instead of nibbling and working a full count, Wells.
  18. Man, I had no idea that Phillies' offense was so...underwhelming this year.
  19. .850+ would be pretty [expletive] phenomenal given how down 3B production is around baseball.
  20. If his power numbers rebound why wouldn't he be?
  21. All those balls just kept hitting those damn birds.
  22. Wanna see a Fecal League?!?! Check out this guy's diaper, AMIRITE?!?!?! HIGH FIVE!!!
×
×
  • Create New...