Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Then perhaps you will enjoy this breakdown of that montage: http://www.sbnation.com/2013/6/21/4449812/enhance-little-big-leagues-baffling-runaround-sue-montage
  2. From LBL, but still, it makes me laugh in how dorky it is: http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/2816899/celebraish.gif
  3. I could have sworn I caught the weekend Sox show on the Score a few weeks ago and they mentioned something about Sale having the success he is having "despite throwing his fastball a couple of miles slower" or something along those lines. I have no idea if this is correct or not.
  4. Since you used your two first-half transactions, this will count as your first second-half transaction, and will subsequently apply when games resume. In that case... Drop Ryan Braun Add Miguel Cabrera Drop Matt Kemp Add Carlos Gonzaelz
  5. Yeah, I'm not really understanding the argument against him...the Cubs are better off because they've gotten similar or even better production at times from someone like Soriano or Schierholtz or DeJesus this season? How is that a good thing? I'd rather have a younger guy with real potential around for at least 4 years than older guys signed for a year or two who are either going to be gone or were simply brought in to platoon/be traded.
  6. CESPEDES WILL RULE US ALL. Get your damn logic out of here, TT; it cannot heal my broken heart.
  7. Pujols also played against the Cubs in an era in which the Cubs emerged as a contender and should have done more. McGwire's time coincided with a time when the Cubs had a brief glimpse of success but were largely an also ran. Yeah, definitely. Outside of the HR chase I really didn't see McGwire as more than just an annoyance who wasn't around very long, whereas Pujols was an active detriment to this team doing better when they actually had several chances to really succeed while he was on the Cardinals.
  8. Still think that story is nonsense. His agent would have to be one of the worst ever.
  9. 4.6 fWar in 208 games so far. he's good. Congrats to Yoenis for having a good rookie season, considering most of that was earned in 2012. He's now 27, can't get on base, is really a corner OF rather than a CF and is a free agent after two more seasons. I don't care about him at all. Well, maybe a little, but not much. He's got a 1.6 WAR so far this season. The Cubs missed out on a useful player who would have only cost them money. I'm sure you are correct, but I keep seeing a WAR of 0.9 for this season. That said, his label has now dropped to that of "useful" rather than star or superstar. I'm quite confident if he was on our team, people would be calling him a huge disappointment with his .225 batting average and .293 on base. I know this because they say that about a 23-year-old Anthony Rizzo who has better numbers. Sorry, but Yoenis is just not that good. Useful? I guess. But useful doesn't make the baseball fan in me lose much sleep. 0.9 is the BR number, 1.6 is the FG number. FG also has him already worth his salary this season, but take that for what it's worth. I for one didn't think he was going to be a superstar off the bat (or was a lock to be one); most people seemed to think he'd take a bit of time to truly adjust, which was one of the main reasons the Cubs wanted him for 6 years instead of 4 (the serious potential for a big payday after 4 years being the other). The guy is never making more than $10.5 million a year, and it shouldn't be surprising if at all if he easily outperforms his contract. And it's not like it's an either/or between him and Rizzo; I'd much rather have both and the Cubs could have had both.
  10. I figured it was Pujols with this line against the Cubs: .304 .406 .626 1.032 and 56 HR in 771 PA Though Pujols has basically been the entire NL Central's nemesis with similar numbers for each team. Hell, after checking McGwire's numbers I'd still pick Pujols. Pujols put those numbers up over 178 games against the Cubs; McGwire only played in 42 with 172 PA. Insane as McGwire's numbers were, Pujols has "felt" more like a nemesis to me because he was around for so much longer.
  11. 4.6 fWar in 208 games so far. he's good. Congrats to Yoenis for having a good rookie season, considering most of that was earned in 2012. He's now 27, can't get on base, is really a corner OF rather than a CF and is a free agent after two more seasons. I don't care about him at all. Well, maybe a little, but not much. He's got a 1.6 WAR so far this season. The Cubs missed out on a useful player who would have only cost them money.
  12. I like how it glossed over a probable murder in his past. What, the car accident?
  13. So when can we do our next set of changes? After the ASG? And when can we change WC picks?
  14. [expletive] YOU, THEO.
  15. He's just trolling N&G We're singing a bi-lingual version of "Somewhere Out There" to each other right now.
  16. At least one of those guys better be getting [expletive] traded, davell.
  17. Well, hey, as long you're being realistic in your expectations.
  18. Alright, I'm back to hating the team, the FO, all of the farm system and all Cubs fans. What a remarkable game.
  19. Do the cubs even have anyone hitting .289? Probably some prospect somewhere, so all of his runs will count for triple or something if he makes it.
  20. I just wish the Cubs had an awesome player.
  21. Yeah, one bad performance against arguably the best offensive team in baseball is going to make him worthless.
×
×
  • Create New...