Ingram won the closest Heisman vote in history that should tell you it was a pretty fragmented field. And yes, I think you transported him to ND '12 Teo is still getting a good deal of support considering Ingram had the most pedestrian numbers of basically any winner in a long time. And the McClain thing was to illustrate a point. We're not talking about just a difference in vote totals. We're talking about two guys who played the same position on similarly successful defenses. One guy didn't receive a single vote and the other is going to finish 2nd in the Heisman. That's partly a function of ND hype. How about illustrating the point that McClain was probably his own team's 5th-best player and ballots only contain spots for 3 people? McClain was a unanimous All American and won the Butkus. Cody and Ingram were similarly productive/lauded as McClain. To say that Jones and Richardson were is completely disingenuous. Richardson was better than Ingram, and that was being openly discussed before Ingram even won the Heisman, so I'm going to say it's not. The point is, the #1 team almost always has their best player as a Heisman candidate. If Golson or Riddick or Wood had gaudier numbers it'd be them, but they don't, so it's Te'o. Is he going to get more votes than another LB who was also the top-ranked team's best player would normally get because it's ND and because of his story? Probably. But the #1 team's best player has been mentioned as a Heisman candidate just about every year for forever. Just for fun, I looked it up, and every year since 2000, the nation's top-ranked team going into the bowls had a Heisman finalist, except for 2007, which was also the year every BCS school except Ohio State lost twice, and the nation's only unbeaten (Hawaii) had a Heisman finalist that year too.