Andy
-
Posts
36,835 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Andy
-
That's from the Mooney interview/article in The Athletic last week about adding Kimbrel and Castellanos last year, it's time for Tommy to nut up. The rallying cry for shipping Bryant out is to protect the future of the team, well here's your MVP caliber 3B locked up long term (after you give him another guaranteed year for removing his opt out) on a silver platter. Sure it's complicated but get it done. Full up with a better one already Bryant can play the outfield. Put it this way, there is literally nothing, within reason, the Cubs can do right now that would increase their chances of winning a title this year more than going to get Arenado. Especially if the most likely alternative is him playing for St. Louis.
-
Players really ought not to have to choose between being paid what they're worth and having any hope of being on a competitive team ever.
-
The Packers are just making one stupid mistake after another. Blowout city
-
For whatever it's worth [tweet] [/tweet] -
[tweet] [/tweet]
-
Lame-ass 'proper channels' cop-out by Mendoza. It's pretty damn clear that no amount of going through the 'proper channels' was going to stop Houston from doing what it was doing.
-
When you've even managed to piss off Anthony Rizzo...
-
Yeah, I think this is about where I land. I'm taking more amusement than I should in what's happening to the Astros right now and it would definitely horsefeathering suck if the Cubs were getting the same treatment.
-
Saw the headline, has he been hurt? Or just trying to get out of the NFL alive? He missed like 7 games this year due to concussions. Not this year. The video above is from 2016, and he missed the rest of that season. Ever since, he was probably 1 more concussion from hanging it up, and I've been bracing for this for a while now. Luckily, as far as we know, he never got another concussion. I'm going to miss watching him a lot. My wife just got me a Kuechly jersey for Christmas because I had mentioned once that if I got another jersey it'd probably be him due to his already being a legend. I figured he would be out within a couple years. The most technically flawless player I've ever seen on a field.
-
Why not? The WS title should be stripped. What does that do exactly? Force them to take the flag down? I always felt like the NCAA vacating wins was such a lame punishment. This would be the same effect. The NCAA vacating wins is lame because it's usually done for lame reasons (people giving players money) more so than because the punishment itself is lame. I didn't really expect them to vacate the title, but if you were ever going to do it, large-scale and provable cheating would be the reason to do it.
-
Mike Leach and Lane Kiffin heading up the most ridiculous rivalry in CFB is a future too glorious for us to deserve.
-
Given the Alex Cora thing, the real surprise would've been if they never found anything suspicious with Boston. This particular sign-stealing doesn't seem quite as egregious as Houston's but it's still obviously against the rules.
-
Maybe this isn't the right topic to post this under...By my math, there's aprox. $75.6M coming off the books from last year, which includes players no longer on the roster and any salary decreases (i.e. Lester). And there's aprox. $41.8M in additional salary, which includes salary increases due to both contracts and expected arbitration increases (as projected by MLBTR) and all of the minor signings. So, that leaves approx. $33.8M decrease in money spent on salary from last year. Is there something I'm missing? Is there another reason other than they don't want to spend money for that amount of decrease in spending??? No. There is not.
-
I'm a big Rhule fan. Hiring him for a pro job is definitely a risk, but IMO a worthy one. I actually wanted him for ND someday, but it looks like he was set on eventually going to the pros.
-
-
Convincing the Sugar to move off NYD in years it's not a semifinal so the semis can always be on NYD would qualify as massive. I'd root for that, personally. Rose Bowl as well, no? It would only take 1 of them to make it possible to have 2 NYD semifinals annually. They'd sandwich the Rose those other years, but it wouldn't be any more awkward than this is.
-
Convincing the Sugar to move off NYD in years it's not a semifinal so the semis can always be on NYD would qualify as massive. I'd root for that, personally.
-
Christian McCaffrey went 1,000/1,000, 3rd guy ever. Marshall Faulk 99 and Roger Craig in the 80s. Carolina went 5-11 and got their horsefeathers kicked in the entire month of December. Way to go, guys. Please draft Tua.
-
That game was a blast and Lawrence vs Burrow is an unreal matchup for the title game.
-
He is technically correct if only because Florida State only dropped to 2 in the AP poll in '14. There was, of course, no selection committee in '66 when it happened to (oddly enough) Alabama. It's transparently a motivational tactic for his team, but yeah, it's pretty lame. At least no one on his team got suspended for PEDs this year.
-
In the last 4 years the Cubs payroll was 12% over the Cards, 88% over the Brewers, 74% over the Reds, and 102% over the Pirates. We were the Yankees of the NL Central. I'm okay with being the Yankees of the NL Central (we should be the Yankees of the NL Central). I'm not okay with being the older version, high-spending Yankees of MLB. I am. Everyone in MLB is swimming in money, if the Cubs decided to swim in slightly less money and the rest of them didn't, that's their damn problem.
-
I can't speak for everyone here, but I would assume most don't have a particular number in mind. The general idea, though (certainly my idea), is that some of the stuff that's been tossed around in order to get below whatever payroll ceiling the Ricketts have in mind, during a clear window of contention that you can't automatically assume will be repeated, is really really stupid. I understand not paying through the nose for Cole or Rendon, but there's no real reason the Cubs should be basically ignoring the possibility of signing anybody at all absent cost-slashing moves that will hurt the on-field product.
-
The tl;dr is that going over the tax for the 2nd straight year is more like a ~25 million cost than a ~5 million cost, and doing so for a 3rd straight year is upwards of 50 million. "Putting it another way: The system in place makes it much cheaper for the Cubs to have a $207 million payroll in 2020 and then a $250 million payroll in 2021 than to have a $209 million payroll in 2020 and then a $211 million payroll in 2021. It’s an absurd extension of the way these penalties are structured, but it’s true." Of course, the level of faith I have in the Ricketts actually consenting to go back over the luxury tax in 2021 (if this cockamamie scheme of theirs pays off in the first place) is basically horsefeathering zero.
-
Trading him now so that they don't have to look cheap for not paying him in 2 years. Also some nonsense about how they tried really hard to get him to sign an extension but they couldn't so they had to try to make the team better by trading their best player. Yeah that's the part I'm mad about to. But this whole league wide collusion thing...I assume the team that would trade for him is planning on paying him, right? Collusion not to go over the luxury tax =/= collusion to not pay anyone at all.
-
By....who? Who do you think is in charge here? The owners, in collusion. But I don’t think Ricketts has a lot of pull among them as fairly recent member of the club. Ricketts was allowed to buy the team as long as he was willing to participate in their newest version of collusion, and he was willing. So he may not have much pull but that doesn't mean he has any desire to run afoul of the party line, anyway.
