He can be. But, he's an IFA under the age of 23. The new CBA kicks in on that date and it puts all of those guys in under the rest of the IFA for that signing period. the max spending limit is 2.9 mill total. Of course, you CAN go over that amount, but if you exceed it by more than 5 and less than 10 percent, it means you pay a 75 percent luxury tax on the amount you go over it by. If you spend between 10 and 15 percent over, you pay a 100 percent luxury tax, plus aren'T allowed to give anyone the following year a 500,000 bonus or higher. if you go 15 percent or more over, it costs you a 100 percent luxury tax and can't spend 250,000 or more on a player the following year. What this does, is it takes teams that were "out" on Soler, because we were looking at giving him 27 mill or so, and puts them right back in, because lets say you were willing to pay him 10 mill, you could basically give him 6.5 or so, pay the overage tax and be there. You just probably would spend your entire IFA budget on him and no one else. This doesn't seem likely for us to do, because we need strength in numbers. If he still wants his same amount, it's cost us over 50 mill, to give him the 27. He could then roll the dice, stick in the Dominican and wait until he's 23, when he's no longer under this rule. Which is why I want this to be done with in time to where that doesn't become an option for him.