Jump to content
North Side Baseball

mul21

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,842
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by mul21

  1. I don't have access to this but allegedly it says that there were in-house warnings to Poles (from his Tennessee days) about the Nate Davis signing being problematic and he ignored them. I've been in favor of keeping him but that level of blatant disregard for advisors who clearly knew something makes me think he needs to go. https://www.chicagotribune.com/2024/12/13/chicago-bears-ryan-poles-future/
  2. What's the story on Bohm's defense? Bad and then turned a corner last year? Still bad and it was a metrics blip (last year is the first year he's not had a negative defensive WAR per BR)?
  3. Yeah, I definitely want a LHH handcuff for Shaw if he were to be the OD 3B.
  4. Both. Felt like a lot of business decisions being made last week and for all his faults, Flus can call a defense and knew what the other team was going to try to do to them. I also think the rain and field conditions caused a lot of problems for both teams last night that significantly affected the scoring totals.
  5. I think people are hoping for a 2 WAR season from Shaw, and if he's handcuffed with a LHH option to face some of the RHP he may struggle against, that seems like a reasonable expectation from the position as a whole. It feels like people are cautiously optimistic about his prospect profile from a hitting standpoint and we haven't heard any deal breakers defensively, so while not in love with that plan, the net WAR gain from a Tucker/Shaw combination vs a Cody/Paredes combination feels like a pretty significant upgrade.
  6. Here's you (in that thread) agreeing that someone else's numbers are right and you hadn't added in money for injuries. Please stop.
  7. Stop trying to use logic with Tom. 🤣
  8. People. Have. Done. The. Math. For. You. On. This. Message. Board. They showed you all the numbers and explained why they were what they were, yet you insist on claiming their sources are magic and witchcraft for what reason I don't know. As was said earlier, you have a preconceived notion about things and absolutely refuse to accept any new information other than things that confirm those.
  9. Ignorant? People have done the math for you ad nauseum. You're the ignorant one.
  10. I'm exactly the opposite. There's so much OF depth in the minors (and about to be ready for prime time) plus I think Smith has a higher ceiling and is a little lower risk than Caissie with all his swing and miss.
  11. Yeah, getting Paredes and Smith seems redundant unless the Astros already have a plan to move one of them elsewhere. I mean, speculation pre-draft was Smith may be destined for RF and maybe that's where the Astros see him long term anyway.
  12. They're doing that because they had Heyman on, so same source.
  13. I think Smith has the highest ceiling of any of the Cubs prospects and that's not shiny new toy infatuation. The power, average, K%, and ability to play 3B combination make for a very exciting potential. No idea if he reaches it, but that's where I see him and I'd hate to lose him. Two other things not necessarily directed at you but: 1. It's Paredes, one A, two Es. 2. Heyman is the only person who has even considered that the Astros are asking for BOTH Paredes and Suzuki and I really wish people would stop reposting what looks to be obviously erroneous reporting at this point.
  14. What are the rules around the minor league portion of the Rule 5? Do those guys ever go back to their original team?
  15. It's hilarious how many people are definitively saying the Cubs won't even attempt to sign him to an extension if they trade for him. I'm all about bashing them for being cheap asses, but the certainty some of you have in saying they won't even make an attempt is comical and just plain dumb.
  16. Sure, at a $10 million premium and half the WAR.
  17. I was capped at $125 when I worked for Pepsi. It was tough to find anything decent under that without our corporate agreements and I left that job in 2019. That's just crazy when the budget for everything else is so astronomical. But hey, the rich get richer and everyone else can get horsefeathered I guess.
  18. Somehow Amaya was worth 1.9 bWAR last year and the combination of Gomes, Nido and Bethancourt were worth -0.4. If Kelly gives them the 0.7 he did for the 60 games in Detroit last year, that's a net 1.1 bWAR. Seems like an important move to me for those who are less than excited about it.
  19. I thought it was either that or a labrum when I saw it happen and based on how he was carrying the arm when he came in for the injury play, UCL is a good bet.
  20. I was shocked that didn't even get a look by the booth review crew. I couldn't clearly see the ball hit the ground in the replays I saw.
  21. OSU is behind them because they lost to a mediocre Michigan team in the last week of the season at home.
  22. He's on a split contract so this is verifiably inaccurate.
  23. I think the age difference and more recent arm issues preclude an extension for Steele at the moment.
  24. I actually wouldn't hate Vrabel. His OCs in TN were Arthur Smith and Matt LaFleur, so he knows how to hire the right people. That said, I'd much prefer an offensive minded coach, but if the Bears are going to Bears, Vrabel would at least be a solid choice.
×
×
  • Create New...