You don't see how the presence of absence of an MLB pitcher better than any one in our organization, in the heart of his prime, changes the short-term outlook of our chances? Or do you not think the short-term outlook of our chances changes how the front office behaves in any given offseason? I'm not sure where the hang-up is here. First of all, I don't think any of us know with certainty that he would be better than anyone in our organization, not by a long shot. We had hoped so, but there are plenty of red flags. I didn't say that it had no effect on our short term chances. I just think that 2015 is the stated breakthrough year, and Tanaka would have probably made us better next year but not changed the FO mindset for when we are "going for it".