Because this issue has mainly been fabricated in the minds of Purdue/Illinois fans. Illinois, you know, the program that just had how many players transfer? It's not as if Illinois overcommitted on scholarships so that they had to find creative ways to get rid of kids. This case, it just sounds like the kids wanted to play more than they were at Illinois, and Groce was up front about things and told them they weren't going to play much there. This is just more rationalizing. Players leave Illinois because they want to play more . . . players leave IU because IU's coach is a meanie (and, of course, was not up front and did not tell players they weren't going to play much there because, well, what exactly? Because Illinois fans that hate IU will it so?). Players that have left IU for more playing time/to be closer to home have been used by this board, ad nauseam, to prove that "Creaning" exists. Meanwhile, only one such player left when there was a scholarship crunch (Capobianco). That player was "Creaned"; sure, there's little way around that. (The only other player that has left when IU was under a scholarship crunch was Ron Patterson. Patterson was admitted to the university on a contingency basis, failed to make his grades, and violated the honor code (the honor code, by the way, prohibits cheating). Moreover, he ended up at Syracuse. If this was just a Machiavellian "Creaning" why not "Crean," say, Maurice Creek or Peter Jurkin or Austin Etherington or Remy Abell? Would any of those players have ended up at a program of Syracuse's ilk? Or even at a BCS program?) You keep moving the goalposts here. We're not the ones rationalizing why our players transferred.