Jump to content
North Side Baseball

bukie

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,386
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    20

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by bukie

  1. If anything, the value of the front office and management in baseball is the most vastly undervalued commodity in the sport right now. It's really Moneyball in action.
  2. Good enough for 10th in the league in scoring...and now the defense...32nd in league in scoring. Cant be 10th per game. That's all that matters. No, I'm pretty sure the defense matters too...
  3. I mean, in an effort to gain depth, you traded QB and WR depth for the RBs of two of the four worst teams in the league, who likely won't be running much in games.
  4. Good enough for 10th in the league in scoring...and now the defense...32nd in league in scoring.
  5. @FO_ASchatz Brady 27-of-31 today, with three drops and one pass that was miscommunication. That's just... yeah. Bears secondary SUCKS.
  6. I've got to avoid Facebook for a while. Apparently this is all on Jay. Although if guarding TEs is jays responsibility it at least makes sense why they are so wide open.
  7. I think you gave up the best two players in a two for two deal.
  8. I'll take the under on two Maddons.
  9. They [expletive] won?!
  10. Well, at least that didn't end up affecting any team's special 2005 season in the long ru...EVERYTHING IS TERRIBLE.
  11. Yes, I'm sure he's not married simply because he couldn't be tied down.
  12. 36 names on that list, and it doesn't include Rizzo, Castro, Castillo, Arrieta, Straily, Strop, Turner, Rondon or Grimm .
  13. Of course, it was fun mostly because Thibs had the starters in and Atlanta was using D-leaguers for the whole 4th quarter. There was no reason for starters to be there aside from Thibs being psycho and having priorities out of whack. Oh absolutely. It was insanity from Thibs, but the crowd and team were into it enough, I was able to just soak it in and enjoy it fully. True story, there's an ESPN Chicago article that asserted the entire takeaway from last night was Thibs doesn't trust Rose in crunch time since he wasn't out there with the rest of the starters. Pure bonkers. Also, Stacey King is as crazy as Thibs.
  14. Of course, it was fun mostly because Thibs had the starters in and Atlanta was using D-leaguers for the whole 4th quarter. There was no reason for starters to be there aside from Thibs being psycho and having priorities out of whack.
  15. Is he broken? No, I think that statistically the SEC West teams have been that good, but if the polls looked like that, everyone would basically quit on college football. 7 of the top 11 in the SEC, with the other 4 being Oklahoma, Baylor, TCU and Oregon.
  16. Man, the Sagarin predictor ratings are a bit hilarious this week.
  17. Looks good to me, although I'd flip Bama and Oregon, and kick Baylor down to 9 or 10. No top 10 team should give up that many points to TCU. You realize TCU was also a top 10 team, right?
  18. I'm not sure I've ever seen a period this one sided.
  19. Hard to believe people still blindly make this argument. Hard to believe the SEC nuts still can't fathom the concept of a team not in the SEC actually being good. This is made up. The strength of the SEC this year isn't in a superteam or two like year's past, but in it's solid to great depth. Oklahoma, Mich St or FSU would give any SEC team a run. Along with Baylor, TCU, Notre Dame, Oregon, UCLA, Stanford and Ohio State, really. Actually, coming into today, ND's resume to this point looked better than FSU's.
  20. 24, because ND plays FSU next week, and Mississippi has already played Alabama. And since you still haven't really gotten the point, I'll spell it out: eliminating the possibility of a team being good because they struggle, or they "haven't played anybody" (when your definition of "anybody" is apparently simply the SEC West) is sad at best and hilarious at worst. However, that SEC smugness just shines through as soon as some other team is considered good. Your premise is that the SEC West is overrated? Ok. Defending Notre Dame by throwing "smug" out there is good stuff. No, the premise is that other teams outside the SEC might actually be good, but the SEC blinders are so heavy, you can't see that. Oh, and I'm an Illinois fan, you biased fool. Can you not see the hilarity in the statement that FSU beating ND next week (which hasn't happened) is somehow meaningless because ND barely beat UNC, so neither team could be good?
  21. Hard to believe people still blindly make this argument. Hard to believe the SEC nuts still can't fathom the concept of a team not in the SEC actually being good.
  22. That...was a better start.
  23. 24, because ND plays FSU next week, and Mississippi has already played Alabama. And since you still haven't really gotten the point, I'll spell it out: eliminating the possibility of a team being good because they struggle, or they "haven't played anybody" (when your definition of "anybody" is apparently simply the SEC West) is sad at best and hilarious at worst. However, that SEC smugness just shines through as soon as some other team is considered good.
  24. Was thinking it had been a while since there was some blatant SEC snobbery in the thread. Our high ranked teams wouldn't be squeaking out a win against UNC, the same team that gave up 29 to Liberty. Or losing at home to Indiana. Of course, they wouldn't be playing UNC or Indiana, since the schedule is too full with Memphis and Florida Atlantic.
×
×
  • Create New...