I'm not taking away points. Where are the points that can be taken away. The problem is he can't hit, not all that well at least. Who cares? Um, I would think Cubs fans. A light hitter can still hit .300. A light hitter refers to power, not average. His SLG is okay, but it's propped up by average as he's had very little HR power, even compared to others in his league. It makes perfect sense to call such a hitter a light hitter. Wasn't Mark Grace a light hitter? I care because a prospect with okay numbers that are heavily dependent on AVG with no power or patience doesn't exactly scream top notch offensive talent to me. And that's the point of this whole discussion. At this point Colvin is nothing more than another guy who might contribute a bit to the team, but he's nobody to get overly giddy about when talking about the potential for big things on the Cubs by their current group of young hitters. You said he is a weak hitting corner OF because he won't play CF for the Cubs. It's not like he doesn't have the ability to play CF, where he would likely be slightly above average offensive. Secondly, yes, Mark Grace was a weak hitter. That's because his career IsoP was .139.....a far cry from .185. The "propped up" comment doesn't make sense to me, because couldn't you say the same thing about David Ortiz? His SLG is higher than Dunn's because he hits .320 as opposed to .240, but the power is similar. Third, again with the no power comment. Sure he's not hitting light tower HRs, but at this point he is 1 off the league lead with 22 doubles. He plays his home games in the largest park in the FSL. He's yet to fill out his 6'3" frame. .185 ISOP is above average power, no matter it he does it with doubles, triples or HRs.