Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Irrelevant Dude

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    12,831
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Irrelevant Dude

  1. Do we have any idea what Nico's estimated arbitration salary would have been over the next two seasons? This deal is fine, but it seems like it might be a better deal for Nico than it is for the Cubs.
  2. I personally have a strong preference to use Tapatalk. Mobile browser experiences have come a long way, but there is still something to be said for the simplicity and consistency of Tapatalk.
  3. Man, once the Cubs ink that new TV deal, Ricketts is really going to be able to open the pocketbooks!
  4. I, for one, am interested to see where this alternate timeline takes us. The possibilities are endless!
  5. Are the caretaker subscriptions working yet? I tried signing up, but I'm getting an error.
  6. Hey Phillies, any interest in Eric Hosmer???
  7. I mean, it's a concern with every pitcher, especially hard-throwing ones. I don't remember hearing anything specific about his motion that was a concern, though. He had to be shut down from pitching his senior season due to arm problems. https://www.tapinto.net/towns/west-essex/sections/sports/articles/paterson-s-nazier-mule-looks-forward-to-bright-baseball-future-after-being-drafted-by-chicago-cubs-89ff7112-fc55-42aa-a949-8df85016fd3f Him having TJS isn't surprising at all, and I assume the Cubs knew that was a very likely possibility when they drafted him. He is years away from the upper minors anyway, so hopefully he gets this out of the way now and it doesn't hinder his development too much.
  8. Davis is the guy I would be focused in on. He seems like the right combination of high ceiling and injury risk that would make a long term discount attractive to both sides. If he can at least prove that he is healthy right now and looks to be MLB-ready after a few months in AAA, then I don't think it's crazy to try to lock him up for a few extra years on a reasonable deal. Considering his injury history, I would have to think he would be open to a deal.
  9. No to all of these except Nico, and that doesn't seem likely (maybe next year if he puts together another solid season in 2023). The rest of the guys on your list are complete non-starters. There is no reason to consider extending any of them at this point.
  10. One way or another, Rodgers is going to completely screw the Jets.
  11. It's only spring training, and only 19 official at bats, but hopefully Swanson starts hitting the ball soon. He isn't off to a great start at 1-19 with 8 K's. He does at least have 5 walks though.
  12. The live experience is my biggest concern. TV broadcasts are going to be fine, and likely more palatable for most people. But when I have to travel over an hour both ways to get to a game, then find parking, walk/shuttle to the ballpark, etc, I don't want my actual game experience to be over in 2 hours. On the other hand, if games are wrapping up by 9:00, maybe that's more opportunities to take my school-aged kids to weeknight games... so consider me still undecided. We will just have to wait and see how it plays out when we get to playing regular season games.
  13. Bears sure are spending a lot for LB's to back up Sanborn.
  14. I don't think that is a fair comparison. For the players, it's great, but at some point it likely becomes a negative for the fans if games are consistently clocking in shorter than any other major sport. And this isn't really our concern, but what does it do to advertising revenue when there is 30-45 minutes less of live game content each night? I guess we'll see how it plays out over time. I still like it for the most part, but I have some concerns with how significantly the games are being shortened. Whether or not it’s a fair comparison, I don’t know. But what if you could drive to work in less time? Wouldn’t that be better for you? Doing anything you want to do with more time freedom seems better to me. I don’t care about advertisers or owners. We're comparing watching a baseball game to driving to work? If baseball is that boring to everyone, we might as well just give up on it altogether.
  15. What if you could play a round of golf in 2.5 hours consistently? Would that be too far? I don't think that is a fair comparison. For the players, it's great, but at some point it likely becomes a negative for the fans if games are consistently clocking in shorter than any other major sport. And this isn't really our concern, but what does it do to advertising revenue when there is 30-45 minutes less of live game content each night? I guess we'll see how it plays out over time. I still like it for the most part, but I have some concerns with how significantly the games are being shortened.
  16. 21 combined hits today and the game lasted 2 hours, 15 minutes. I mostly like the pitch clock so far, but have we gone too far?
  17. I don't know what the results will be for MLB, but I don't think it is possible to draw conclusions based on minor league games. They are two completely different experiences. The primary argument seems to be that people were leaving the games at the same time anyway, so concessions weren't impacted. Are people who have paid significantly more money for tickets as willing to leave a meaningful MLB game as early as someone who paid very little to attend a relatively meaningless MiLB game? I certainly don't think so.
  18. The only problem would be the lack of Pat on the radio. Just simulcast it like the Blackhawks used to do.
  19. 2 hours, 14 minutes game time. Wow. Bring Greg Maddux out of retirement and we'll be finishing games in under 2 hours
  20. Eh. To be fair, if the refs had any idea what a goaltend is, the game wouldn't have even made it to overtime. There was some wonky stuff called on both sides, though none more blatant than that goaltend. I'm sure you can point to several " if that didn't happen then..." calls in a double OT game. That is true, but the problem is it wasn't just one goaltend. There was the blatant basket interference not called on Dickinson, and then an incorrect goaltend called on Hawkins. Within a short period, that was a 4 point swing just on missed goaltending calls alone. In general though, college officiating seems really bad. Refs anticipate or hunt for calls at certain times, them completely ignore them at other times. The charge on Shannon at the very beginning of the game was clearly not a charge, but that ref was just waiting to call it. Then later in the game there was a really weak moving screen called on Michigan that might have been a foul by the letter of the rules but isn't called 90% of the time. And don't get me started on the flop rule - That just needs to go entirely because it is nearly impossible to get right. Yeah, they aren't going to get everything right, but they sure do get a lot wrong.
  21. Eh. To be fair, if the refs had any idea what a goaltend is, the game wouldn't have even made it to overtime.
  22. Pretty much this, but also while continuing to gobble up real estate and spin it like like they are doing Cubs fans a favor by doing so.
  23. I wouldn't. He missed way too much time last year and we have other guys who can fill in for a short stretch. I would rather Davis get some more time at AAA and hope that he forces the issue later in the season.
  24. Who is the "them" in this sentence? The Blackhawks or the Rangers?
×
×
  • Create New...