Is Jim Hendry still on a lot of medication? So I take it from your comment you know for sure that there weren't 3 or 4 other teams willing to pay him that much? Like it or not, the market for SP is ridiculous, both via trade (e.g. Jennings) and FA (Lilly, Meche, etc.). No one wants to pay those prices. In an ideal world you have enough young SP in your farm system. We thought we did with Wood, Z, and Prior. It's pretty easy to fill in the other 2 spots in a rotation. It's going to take some time to get young pitching from our system now that Wood and Prior can't be counted on. You don't replace #1 starters easily. Veal, Gallagher, and Pawelek are the next wave, but in the meantime we had to pay out the backside. Hendry knows it. He had a choice. Give up our B+ prospects (Pie, EPatt, Veal) via trade and kill our chances at cheap young pitching down the road, or overpay for #3-5 starters in the FA market. While I give Hendry props for not repeating the mistake of running out quad A pitchers or not quite ready pitchers again, it seems as though you minimize the impact of overpaying for mediocre talent. Unless you view this overinflated market as static (i.e. it's not going to correct itself), those contracts could definitely come back to haunt the Cubs.