Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    15,247

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. Rob
    Wow. :shock:
  2. Rob
    I'm assuming Marquis had some trouble keeping the ball down today.
  3. Rob
    Would it help if we were sending these emails through proxies? It could be that they're checking out the ISP and disqualifying votes over that... though I doubt they'd go to such effort.
  4. Rob
    You got one from me. Unfortunately, my school email is down ATM... once it gets back up though I'll try to send another.
  5. Rob
    Baseball Operations (773) 404-4111 Player Development/Scouting (773) 404-4147
  6. Rob
    How can Prior have an option left? He's been up since mid 2003. Shouldn't his option years have ended last year? CPatt still had options in 2005, and he'd been up since 2000. Working from that, I'm fairly certain that if you stay up all season with the big league squad, you don't burn an option.
  7. Rob
    He was hired (at a kingly fee) to lead the Cubs to a world series victory. Hopefully he doesn't consider that a april-october job. What's done to prepare for the regular season cannot be measured until we see the impact it has on the regular season.
  8. Rob
    Looks like Cotts and Wood right now. Cotts still has 2 option years, I believe, and Wood may be getting primed for a quick DL stint with this triceps strain. I still think one or two relievers get traded before opening day. What could Eyre, Jones, and Pagan bring? If we threw in Izturis and a bit of cash, we could probably get Renteria.
  9. Rob
    He was hired to manage the club during the regular season. He hasn't done that yet. Early returns have been relatively positive, but he hasn't actually done what he was hired to yet. You just can't grade him.
  10. Rob
    Looks like Cotts and Wood right now. Cotts still has 2 option years, I believe, and Wood may be getting primed for a quick DL stint with this triceps strain. Seriously? Wood's triceps strain is that bad? I hadn't heard anything about this...geez. I don't really think it's that bad, but it wouldn't surprise me to see the Cubs hold him on the DL for a few weeks to relieve any media pressure on him, not to mention give them a bit more time to shop an extra reliever + jacque jones around for something.
  11. Rob
    Looks like Cotts and Wood right now. Cotts still has 2 option years, I believe, and Wood may be getting primed for a quick DL stint with this triceps strain.
  12. Rob
    I agree. We have a manager who will play the best performing player. Not the one with the better past, etc. We have a manager who has been saying lately that he will play the best performing player, in stark contrast to his actions on the last team he managed. Let's save the absolute comments until we've actually seen him work during the season. I like what he's said just as much as anybody here, but he's yet to follow through on any of that (through no fault of his own, granted). Let's remember to not get too worked up over a couple of sound-bytes, alright? YES SIR!!! Sarcasm duly noted. I just find the disconnect between his old ways and his new soundbytes troubling... especially so when he is leaning towards Miller as the last man in the rotation and the historically pathetic Tomas Perez seems to be grabbing that 25th man spot. If wearing rose-coloured glasses makes your time with the Cubs more palatable, go for it. Forgive me for trying to keep everybody's expectations where they should be, though. I always enjoy my season more when unexpected good things happen, rather than expecting too much and not coming close.
  13. Rob
    2 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 0 BB, 3 K since his return from the injury. Very good strikeout/walk ratio and K/9 innings. :D I like the move.. But I would've preferred a couple more appearances before they decided it for sure. Look at his last three years. I think that should count for more than another handful of ST appearances.
  14. Rob
    I agree. We have a manager who will play the best performing player. Not the one with the better past, etc. We have a manager who has been saying lately that he will play the best performing player, in stark contrast to his actions on the last team he managed. Let's save the absolute comments until we've actually seen him work during the season. I like what he's said just as much as anybody here, but he's yet to follow through on any of that (through no fault of his own, granted). Let's remember to not get too worked up over a couple of sound-bytes, alright?
  15. Rob
    This is fantastic news. With the way Wuertz had been jerked around the last few years, plus his recent injury, I was worried he wouldn't be guaranteed a spot on the roster... while worse bets like Eyre and Dempster would get spots just because of what they're getting paid.
  16. Rob
    You've said this before, and it's simply not true. Davenport adjusts for league difficulty and park effects. Feel free to provide examples. That's the problem with your argument. There's over a hundred guys who were rookies last year. You can find examples on both sides. I'm talking across the board. You really think I can't find some examples of where PECOTA was way wrong on a rookie? And I'm not talking about park effects or league difficulty. The league diffculty you're talking about, I believe, is West to Central, AL to NL. Not AAA to MLB. Take Pie for example. If he does another year in AAA, he's likely to hit the line that was quoted earlier. It's not reasonable to expect him to do as well in MLB as he would do if he did another year in AAA. If you want to write up a list of who all broke their rookie eligibility last year, I'll post what PECOTA projected for them last season (assuming they are in the book, naturally).
  17. Rob
    BP 2006 projected a .274/.320/.387 line for Cedeno and had this to say. "As a shortstop, there's little he can't do: his tremendous arm conjures up memories of Shawon Dunston, but cedeno has softer hands and better range. Whether or not he'll become a better hitter is the question. He has a nice, even swing, but he's easily overpowered, and has no notion of working the count. Promoted aggressively throughout his career, he could struggle for a year or two before settling in as a genuinely useful hitter in the big leagues. He's penciled in as the Opening Day shortstop, but it remains to be seen if the Cubs can show some patience and let him grow up in the big leagues, or if they'll get frustrated and turn to Neifi Perez."
  18. Rob
    Shall we begin forming some sort of vengeance task force?
  19. Rob
    It's alive!
  20. Rob
    Yeah, they're called "the guilty ones."
  21. Rob
    You get the same searching for "huseyingazi." Somebody got a new toy and it looks like they were trying it out.
  22. Rob
    I'm impressed the regular has been... unhacked?... so quickly. Kudos to whoever managed that feat.
  23. Rob
    Why would I? Why would you? Did you put a penny in there? I wish. It's a nickel.
  24. Rob
    Why would I? Why would you?
  25. Rob
    Well at least they're too stupid to do anything besides mess with the main page.
×
×
  • Create New...