I may be wrong, but I could have sworn that after yesterday's game, Len said something about the Cubs' record in 1-run games, and it was positive, something like 24-19? I guess I didn't word this properly..... Every team will win games they should have lost and every team will lose games they should have won. It's what happens in the rest of those games that make the difference. I recently showed a prime example of what can happen when you have poor OBP guys at the top of the order in front of your most productive hitters. (See the Lee/100 EXBH thread in baseball discussions). To further break down this glaring problem. Each of those outs in front of Lee reduced the chances of a high scoring inning. Non outs set up for big innings. Because of the decreased chances, it's hard to really only measure 1 or 2 run games. A game that the Cubs lose by 5 might have been a game they could have won if they had quality OBP guys in front of Lee's 3-4, 4-4, 4-5 day. 30 of Lee's 45 HR's have been solo shots. Couple in the other productive bats in the line up along with Lee's automatic increase in production with better OBP guys in front of him, and you end up with a fairly explosive offense, capable of putting up big numbers on the scoreboard. The frustrating part is the team has had the OBP guys on the team all year long. They've just been ignored when it came time to set the top of the line up. Even Todd Walker has 100 at bats in the 6 hole this year. Dusty can ignore this problem if he wants, but the results can't be ignored.