I don't think anyone is arguing the importance of a leadoff hitter. However, what I think people are arguing is what is important to have in a leadoff hitter. Running fast isn't at the top of the list. Getting on base is. If Pierre doesn't hit over .300, his OBP won't be all that great. The only other thing he provides is speed, and I don't care how fast he can run, his speed is worthless if he's not on base to use it. Pierre is a decent leadoff hitter. He's shown that there are seasons where he can be among the league's best table-setters. He's also had two seasons where he probably would have been better off batting eighth. Regardless, he's an improvement over Neifi Perez and the 2005 version of Corey Patterson. But I would have been just as happy had the Cubs plugged Walker into the leadoff spot, pencilled Murton in as the #2 hitter, and overpaid for a better right-fielder either via trade or free agency. As for the Murton vs. Pierre issue, I think there's a very good chance that Murton could outproduce Pierre in 2006...if he's given 500+ plate appearances. This is all moot though. If the Cubs are going to contend, they need decent years out of both players. Well put. Pierre has had over 700 plate appearances in each of the last 3 years and he's scored no more than 100 runs in any of those years. He's had Miguel Cabrera, Carlos Delgado and Todd Helton hitting behind him during that span. He's durable, I'll give him that. But, anyone who can supply a respectable OBP at the top of the order can score 100 runs, speed or no speed, in 700 plate appearances. Grady Sizemore scored 1 more run than Pierre last year in 120 less plate appearances. Grady probably possesses speed more like Murton than Pierre. David Dellucci had 426 plate appearances in the lead off spot last year, and scored 76 times. That's 275 less plate appearances than Pierre. Dellucci is slower than molasses. Who will ever forget Mark Bellhorn's run at the lead off spot back in 2002, when he scored 48 runs in just 250 plate appearances. That's almost 1/3 of the trips to the plate as Pierre last year, or the year before that, or even the year before that. Bellhorn is probably slower than Dellucci. The Cubs used Todd Walker as a lead off hitter in 2004. He had 260 plate appearances and 45 runs scored. Given another 440 plate appearances to equal 700 like Pierre, I don't think it's a stretch to think Walker might have been able to achieve 100. We all know how fast Walker is. Walker isn't as durable as Pierre, I'll give you that. And he is on the wrong side of 30. Walker got next to no at bats in the lead off spot in 2005 after doing a tremendous job in 2004. Meanwhile, pathetic excuse of a lead off hitter after another ran out there day after day. I have no doubt Murton would have been better than most of them. Speed is nice. But, I see no evidence that Pierre's speed creates more production than a less speedy guy who can hit for more power and get on base at a higher percentage. Getting on base for a lead off hitter is priority #1. Staying on base so that the big boppers can bring you in is priority #2. I don't dislike Pierre. I'm just not all that enamored with him. Pierre and Walker at the top of the order could be a nice tandem for our production team of Lee and Ramirez. But, would it be more productive than Matt Murton hitting 1st and Walker hitting 2nd? Murton was on pace to score close to 90 runs hitting mostly at the bottom of the order of a really bad offensive team last year in 700 plate appearances. Walker 2.5m, Murton 350K, Pierre 6m. I like Pierre in general, but he's overpriced, I felt we overpaid in talent to get him, and he wasn't the biggest need on this team. Overall improvement in OBP was the major need of this team, and they traded for a guy fresh off a .326 OBP season. He doesn't draw walks, and this team needs guys who can draw walks AND provide quality offensive production.