I think toonsterwu gave the best reasoning on this in our chat. Basically, Rhee's ranking was comparable to a draft pick/ceiling nod. When healthy, Rhee has phenomenal stuff and the right mindset/grasp for being a top-flight pitcher. He's shown flashes of that in his rehab. If he starts next season at 100%, he'd be a Top 5 prospect in this system. Whether he reaches that remains to be seen. I'm down a bit too much on LeMahieu and Watkins power-wise to rank them much higher than where I've had them. For me, using the "which would I rather trade" method of ranking prospects, it seems hard to put Flaherty or LeMahieu in the top 10. I know I would be much more upset if we lost Burke or Archer in trade than either of those guys. Can I ask why on Archer? I can understand Burke - the system isn't exactly overflowing with power prospects that really project well right now, and when you factor in his general toolsiness with his big season, there's a lot to like. I'd rank Burke higher than Flaherty or LeMahieu. That said, I'm curious why on Archer? As much as he has a nice fast/curve, and while he has shown improvement on his change and command, he's still far away and has a good shot of ending up in the pen. Giving up arms is always hard, but in the right trade, if a team came calling on Archer, I wouldn't mind giving him up. Flaherty, meanwhile, could really become a great 2nd base option. I mean, power and defense alone, and he's intriguing enough. If he can hit for enough contact, that's an excellent option at 2nd. Between Flaherty and Archer, Archer is the only one who has "star potential".