do you? every retooling idea I've seen you make has Murton sitting on the bench or platooning. a bit of a strawman argument, but I am simply amazed at the number of posters who rip Dusty for not playing young players, then turn around and say Murton is not the answer in left and Cedeno is not the answer at short. Considering we're stuck with Jones, that handicaps the upgrades we can make. I'm not opposed to Murton starting and think he can be a great complimentary player. But with the current construction of this team, and the prospects for improvement that exist, I think platooning Murton with Jones may be the best option available. Now, if Murton were given regular playing time for the remainder of the season, he may be able to prove that he's more than what I believe he currently is. that's a false choice though. stop expecting five .390/.525 positions out of this baseball team. find a platoon partner for Jones in right, and let Murton play everyday. that gives you four positions out of the lineup where you can expect .375/.500 in most lineups you run out there (1B, 3B, RF, and C), and allows you to put a group of complimentary obp guys around that core, ie. Matt Murton, with the added benefit of waiting to see if Murton can become a .390/.525 guy. Murton's power would come out immediately with a slight adjustment that the Cubs coaching staff just can't figure out. he usually waits for a good pitch to hit, always puts a good swing on the ball, usually gets the sweet spot of the bat on the ball, it's just a matter of not hitting the top of the ball all the time. edit - see Sulley's thread in transactions. it would not be hard to retool this team with a couple of realistic trades and a couple of realistic signings. I think vance's rationale is that we need one more big bat to go with lee and ramirez and the easiest place to find that is in a corner outfield spot. If we could get a tejada at short or a edmonds during his prime in center I bet he could live with Murton and Jones at the corners.