That's a good analogy, for sure. Why give Thibs a guy like Hinrich that will play into his most meathead tendencies? And why invest heavily in guys like Mirotic (who can definitely play big-time) and McDermott (jury is still way, way out) who play a style of basketball Thibs will never embrace? I'm convinced this marriage is irreconcilable, and Thibs is gone after this year unless by some miracle the Bulls make the finals (and even then it's no slam-dunk). Irrespective of Thibs relative merits as a coach, with a relationship with the F.O. this dysfunctional he's doomed. Blame GarPax for their issues with roster construction, definitely, but Thibs brings a lot of this on himself. He runs his players into the ground and he's agonizingly slow to make adjustments either in-game or out. I think he has a lot of Scott Skiles in him. Its easy to make the Skiles comparison, but its not accurate. Skiles would prefer to be skinned alive before giving significant minutes to the likes of Nate Robinson, DJ Augustin, Aaron Brooks, or Mirotic. The irony, of course, is that Skiles as a player (both at Mich St and Orlando) was creative, flashy, and brutally inefficient. He had a career TOV% of 20.0% (thats 20 TO's for every 100 possessions), a negative defensive rating each year of his career and only 8 career defensive win shares. In other words, he was and is a hypocrite when viewed through the prism of his playing career. Thibs has been far more flexible than Skiles would ever be. Its not his fault that Rose blew out both knees and didn't play for two years. That said, his reliance on Hinrich is a major head scratcher. Makes me wonder if its a passive-aggressive way of sending a message to GarPax.