This will be my last post on this cause it's obvious that we'll never agree on anything. Out of the standard stats, Lee currently has more hits in less at bats, more doubles, more triples (although 1 to nothing isn't saying much), more walks, less strikeouts, a higher average, a higher on base percentage, more steals, plays gold glove defense, and generally plays BETTER later in the season than he does in the beginning. Fielder has more runs (which generally isn't Lee's fault besides the lack of power), more homers, more rbi's, and a better slugging %. That's it. Not to mention, although I know it's an extremely small sample size, his power numbers drop off in the 2nd half of the season (1 homer every 14 at bats in the 1st half, 1 homer every 20 at bats in the second half.) He has yet to prove to me that he can keep up his pace all season. So call me a moron if you want. I really don't care. Fielder is having a better year up to this point. But just because a guy hits a lot of homeruns, doesn't mean he's a better alternative. Fielder has more home runs than Pujols right now too, but I'd rather have Pujols the rest of the year as well.