I think the whole "Walker is bad with the glove" thing snowballed. First it seemed to be "Eh, he's okay. He's no Sandberg, though." Then it was "He could stand to be better" Then it was "Boy, he's really bad over there" and finally now it seems to be "My God, he's quite possibly the worst defensive player in the history of baseball." Ok, I'm exaggerating, but I think people are making FAR too much of a deal over his percieved lack of defense. They don't seem to realize that what he brings to the table with his bat far outwieghs his shortcomings in the field. Our best chance to win is with Walker at 2nd, not Neifi or Hairston. Oh, and apparently he has a "bad attitude." You know, because when the Cubs are in the middle of losing 9 of 11 and a reporter asks him "What do you think of the Cubs play recently?" he's not supposed to say "Well, right now we suck." Sorry, I'm in a sarcastic mood tonight.