Why would they win in court? The Mets' options are spelled out by the CBA and the contract Rodriguez signed. I doubt either contains a stupidity clause that allows the Mets to void. They may threaten it, but it's just posturing. I just don't see how K-Rod could still stand to gain however much money he has coming this year (and whatever part of next year he misses, if any) due to his own stupidity. If it was a baseball-related injury, too bad. The Mets are out of luck. But they shouldn't be forced to pay substantial amounts of money to a player who is physically unable to perform due to his own off-field actions. Well if the Mets want to write a stupidity clause into their player contracts, then more power to them (provided it doesn't conflict with the CBA and players will agree to it). Absent that, though, they're SOL. Like I said, what the Mets can and can't do depends on what's written into the contract, not what you or I consider fair or common sense or whatever. They should be able to void the contract of the Mets GM that was stupid enough to sign him to this deal to begin with.