Oh, I know he's not responsible for the 300ish they've spent. But I do put blame on him for not going harder after an elite SP at the deadline, with where their teams win curve is. And considering they can blow past where their payroll is even now, I guess I lay some blame on them not getting an elite arm last offseason. To not address it at either point seems like a true mistake for sure. They definitely could have spent on the pen at either time too, but went for lesser guys, instead of the elite guys in that instance as well. I may be nitpicking him, but they've got money coming off, had the ability to do much more monetarily, and just didn't utilize the payroll advantage nearly as much as what I would have thought he would have. They have two cy young caliber guys and a crapton of depth. And you are criticizing him for the exact opposite reason you stated in the first place. My original stance on Friedman is that I'm not convinced he'll handle having a large payroll as effectively as some others might. They certainly have depth, no question there. It's not a matter of how much he spends, in my mind. He had the chance to add elite guys instead of depth for both starting pitching and out of the pen and did neither, in a season where they were at/near/maybe slight past their best shot at all of this.....And went safe, instead of taking a risk. I get that playoffs are a crapshoot for the most part and that very well may weaken my stance here. But for THAT team, with THOSE resources, to not have done more over his reign than building depth, it makes me wonder how he'll handle it going forward. They have just as much of a window as the Cubs. They have tons of young players, an excellent system, and tons of money. If everyone should be happy with the Cubs season, why doesn't the same apply to them?