The point that Boog was making, and I was observing is that trades are made on a star/prospect (buy/sell) basis when they could be made on just swapping two to good players from teams who have needs in different areas, and those trades are not made. Boog said that teams are getting caught up in cheap labor markets that never materialize because the cheap labor doesn't produce. Without casting too big a net, people seem to be happy with that as long as the payer is "cost controlled". Cost controlled doesn't mean a damn thing when it's hampering the team's ability to win. Now I know the argument is that having cost controlled players enables a team to spend more money on a star or established player. That's fine, but the name of the game is winning not efficiency.
The Cubs are caught on the wrong side of both ledgers and are in a bad position unless they get creative.