Jump to content
North Side Baseball

CubinNY

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    27,701

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by CubinNY

  1. CubinNY
    Look, I get you really don't want the Cubs to trade Bryant, but it's going to happen... Just make your peace with that fact now. The ruling on his service time issues will happen in early January and the trade will happen shortly after that (KB probably loses that fight). The parameters of the trade will have been established by then. I won't say whether it's smart or a good/bad move until I see the trade package we get back. It'll probably be the Braves or the Nats or maybe the Phillies (if they are willing to include Bohm in the package). Not that it matters now, but I wanted the Cubs to go after Rendon super hard this offseason. If no money issues then sign Rendon and move KB to RF and make the necessary trades to free up cash to do so. If money is really tight I would sign Rendon and trade KB and whatever players are needed to make it happen, but even that wasn't possible (which completely sucks). It's a bad, unneeded move regardless of what the Cubs get back.
  2. CubinNY
    Yes, please. The idea that a franchise almost literally swimming in its own cash would need to trade an extremely productive recent MVP to improve its team (to say nothing of the idea that improving its team would be virtually impossible under that scenario), rather than just going and signing a few players to do so, is horsefeathering bat horsefeathers crazy and anyone who subscribes to that idea out of hand is basically too stupid for any insult to be effective. I think that's pretty logical. Guess not. Carry on. He's not wrong. The Cubs are a big market team so, the only reason to trade the best player who is in his prime and still two years from free agency is... I don't really know the reason.
  3. CubinNY
    That guy is the most worthless news spreader who ever called himself a journalist.
  4. CubinNY
    Yeah, he was... What am I missing? He was traded, but it was because the Cubs wouldnt meet his contract demands with people at the time claiming that they wouldn't pay him what he wanted because he was black I was 7 and in pain. I apologize for not remembering a dark period in my young life.
  5. CubinNY
    How about the Cubs just don't horsefeathering trade their best player? I'm having flashbacks from when I was 7 and the Cubs traded Bill Madlock. I cried then, and I'll cry this time too*. *I know Madlock wasn't traded.
  6. CubinNY
    I'm betting Addison finds himself playing baseball in Japan for a few years, at least.
  7. CubinNY
    Respecting CBT threshold. horsefeathers them. The Ricketts are about the worst possible outcome we got in new owners. They are going to make 10s of millions of dollars in profits on their TV network and Wrigleyville while "respecting the CBT threshold".
  8. CubinNY
    oh PTR definitely sucks ass. I love that the owners are able to create an artificial spending ceiling, but that's capitalism. PTR and the baseball geniuses are about two years away from making the Cubs intentionally bad again and lowering the payroll. Perhaps sooner if they deal Bryant. If I'm Rizzo or any of the "core" and they deal Bryant to clear payroll and get a prospect(s), I'm not signing a contract with them.
  9. CubinNY
    The thread title is weak.
  10. CubinNY
    Nah, they're incredibly overrated. On average, fans especially but even teams fall victim to optimism bias when projecting out young players. Athletes fall apart at a way higher rate than we are comfortable baking into our projections. Having them under non-guaranteed team control >>>> owing them guaranteed deals. It depends on your grading criteria. If you're talking about how many of these deals work out for teams versus how many work out for players, I believe it's pretty close to 50/50. If you're looking at raw dollars though, teams come out WAY ahead. One Chris Sale or Evan Longoria deal is probably equivalent to four or five deals going the other way. The venture capitalist approach.
  11. CubinNY
    Reminds me of the Billy Beane/Lenny Dykstra conversation reported in Moneyball.
  12. CubinNY
    with ballsy moves like these, the Cubs are poised to reclaim their spot atop the NL Central. It's a minor league deal where it's implied that Morrow wants to pay the Cubs back for all the time and money they've invested in him. If that's the case, there is literally no downside to this, nor does it get in the way of any other move. Not suggesting otherwise, just making a joke.
  13. CubinNY
    with ballsy moves like these, the Cubs are poised to reclaim their spot atop the NL Central.
  14. CubinNY
    I sort of checked out of a lot of Cubs related stuff, but it doesn't seem to me that they are poised to recapture dominance. It seems more like they are trying to hang on to relevance.
  15. CubinNY
    There are no Marlin fans and their never well be, baseball is a failure in South Florida.
  16. CubinNY
    Exactly. It's a virtual lock without even knowing who is else is on the table that Contreras over 3 years goes a longer way for them than some unnamed unknown prospects. What are the chances they *actually* get ML impact prospects ready to run roughshod on the league for 6 years? Look how the Samardzija trade turned out for the Cubs and that was landing a guy who ended up one of the best handful prospects in the game right after I think if anyone's throwing an extra player in, probably a pitcher, it's the Rockies. Gray's not the AS (unless he was, I don't know), Contreras is the AS. Gray doesn't play everyday, Contreras plays everyday, Gray has 2 years, Contreras has 3 etc etc I’d take a Wilson/Blackmon trade.
  17. CubinNY
    lol, Royals and Phillies. Harper vs. Hard Ass Joe should be a fun storyline.
  18. CubinNY
    I just want him to not be a bad manager.
  19. CubinNY
    I haven't paid enough attention and I suppose I don't really care all that much, but Ross seems to me like not a very good choice. On the other hand, what do I know?
  20. CubinNY
    No one outside of Baez and Bryant is going to bring anyone back that is all that great.
  21. CubinNY
    Schwarber. I see 49% say, Contreras. Why?
  22. CubinNY
    I don't think Girardi has learned anything. He's steeped in "old school" ideas. There is probably a very good reason he hasn't managed since 2017. I don't know why the Cubs would even interview him.
  23. CubinNY
    horsefeathers every team in the division who aren't the Cubs.
  24. CubinNY
    Will they drag this out until the winter meetings?
  25. CubinNY
    Whoops, forgot he managed in Washington
×
×
  • Create New...