Fixed as something I would have said after 2005 or 2006 even. Young talent: Lance Briggs, Nathan Vasher, Cedric Benson, Rex Grossman, Daniel Manning, Devin Hester, Tommie Harris, Dusty Dvorchek, Bernard Berrian, Mark Bradley It's ridiculous to assume Rodgers would take over with no growning pains. yes, those guys were talented and mostly young, though some aren't great examples (briggs was approaching free agency). plus the packers have a lot of guys who are young and have proven to be very good - jennings, hawk, pickett, grant, and more. benson, grossman, manning and bradley haven't even proven that they'll be above average at their positions. and while i'm not assuming no growing pains, i'm looking at the two teams and seeing that the packers haven't lost much off last year's team, while the bears have not improved on paper at all, and have lost their best player at a position where they are already poor in talent. the packers will be better than the bears in 2008 unless rodgers is truly horrible, or the packers are completely decimated by injuries.