really, the valid arguments are the one above - home stats versus road stats - and the counting stats. the counting stats are a bad argument, because his counting stats were hurt by the era he played in, and they are still excellent for a third baseman. the home/road argument - wrigley played as a hitter's park, though not an extreme hitter's park, so santo's splits are larger than one would expect given the hitter's advantage of wrigley. this would suggest, i guess, that his game was tailored more to wrigley than most guys. that isn't something to penalize him for - if he was able to gain a bigger advantage there than the average hitter, that's something that benefits the team. it's not just padding the stats at a home park because it's a hitter's paradise, a la coors in the '90s. plus, a lot of guys have better home career numbers. that's not a reason to invalidate their stats. yaz had a career .779 road ops, and much of his career was played in a more offensive era than santo. nobody argues against him being a hall of famer, because he was still a very good player. a couple more notes. a look at santo's clutch stats and leverage stats shows that the "non-clutch" label is garbage. also, wrigley may have helped him as far as his splits, but over the course of his career, he was significantly worse in september than in most other months. the cynic would say that it's because he choked or whatever, but playing most of his games under the hot summer sun probably caused him to wear down. the fact that he was a diabetic in a time when the disease was not especially well-understood or well-treated makes this even more likely.