miami and florida state i can buy, but hawai'i? come on, they weren't thinking "here's a tough non-conference team we can play," they were thinking "here's a wac school that goes 8-4 every year and then wins the hawai'i bowl, but is notoriously bad on the mainland, especially when traveling longer distances." but yes, when you have miami and fsu on your non-conference schedule, you can expect to play a difficult schedule. i'm not taking florida to task for playing an easy schedule in or out of conference, but i do have a big problem with them losing to ole miss. and again, i wish psu would schedule another legitimate game every year. they do try to schedule one each year - nebraska and miami in the late '90s and early '00s, notre dame the last two years, syracuse (who it turns out is awful) this year and next. the problem i have is that if that "real" non-conference opponent is down, then your non-conference schedule - which they usually fill out with mac schools, temple (so tired of playing them) and a i-aa team here and there - is a joke. if the conference is strong then it's not a huge deal, but if the big ten is down, then the schedule is really lame and you're not going to get a whole lot of respect. the only year i can remember playing two legitimate bcs teams was in 2003 when we hosted boston college and then went to nebraska.