Yeah, it's funny how ERA+ is thrown around as an "advanced" stat just because it's normalized. Garland regression will be fun, especially as Steve Phillips and John Kruk wonder what happened to such a wonderful pitcher. This would be a good time to remind everyone that Kruk's BALL+ rating is 50. he's not as good as he was during his best season but he's not as bad as he was last season. he's basically in the jeff suppan, jason marquis mold - back end starters who stay healthy, eat up innings, don't strike out many guys and, BABIP fluctuations aside, are basically league average.