If true, there's a reason for that. Batista is terrible. He's 36 and he hasn't been any good for 3 years. if by not good you mean better than the major league average pitcher, then yes, he hasn't been any good for 3 years You guys need to get over ERA+. He had a WHIP over 1.5 the two years he was a starter, a K/BB near 1 both years he was a starter, an OBP against over .350 both those years, and an OPS against around .780. He's 36 years old and it's likely going to get worse, he's a terrible option for the rotation. Still, your argument that he's terrible has no validity. Yes, yes it does. A 1.5 WHIP is terrible, striking out as many guys as you walk is terrible, giving up baserunners at a .350 clip is terrible. I agree, but unfortunately for your cause, Miguel Batista didn't do that. Glendon Rusch was terrible. Oliver Perez was terrible. Miguel Batista has been, at worst, a little below average the past three years.