Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    BREAKING: Cubs Sign Third Baseman Alex Bregman to Five-Year Deal

    The Cubs got their man this time. With the largest annual average value in team history and the long-term, no-opt-out structure they craved last winter, they’ve signed Alex Bregman.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Brian Fluharty-Imagn Imagesan F

    Cubs Video

    The Chicago Cubs and third baseman Alex Bregman have agreed to a five year, $175-million deal, sources confirmed to North Side Baseball. 

    Bregman, who will turn 32 in March, gets the largest AAV in Cubs history, at $35 million. The deal spares the team from having to spread money out into Bregman's late 30s and early 40s, though it almost guarantees that they will surpass the competitive-balance tax threshold for 2026—and perhaps years to come.
     
    In exchange for that, the Cubs get a player who fits their offensive philosophy perfectly. Bregman makes exceptionally good swing decisions and has run superb contact rates almost throughout his career. He lacks high-end bat speed, but creates power by excelling at pulling the ball in the air. He also plays a sturdy third base, and his arrival carries interesting implications for Matt Shaw and Nico Hoerner.
     
    Things were very different for Bregman this year, untethered from the qualifying offer but one year older and with a platform season in which he hit brilliantly early, got hurt, then struggled at times in the second half. Instead of being open to flexible structures and locking in on deals that offered him quick paths back to free agency, Bregman and agent Scott Boras sought a lucrative long-term deal. The Red Sox, who wooed Bregman with a deferral structure and multiple opt-outs last winter, were willing to go longer than the Cubs in terms of years, but refused to pay the high AAV the Cubs offered.
     
    Once he landed Edward Cabrera in a trade earlier this week, Hoyer got permission from ownership to exceed the CBT threshold in order to sign either Bregman or Bo Bichette, a source familiar with the team's plans said. That allowed Chicago to scale up its offer to Bregman, and helped them land the player they hoped would be the capstone to their offseason last year.
     
    In 10 big-league seasons, Bregman has had an on-base percentage under .350 just twice: in 2016 and in 2024. After being in the Astros organization for nearly a decade, he signed with the Red Sox in February and batted .273/.360/.462 in 495 plate appearances. That marked his highest slugging average since 2019, and with the deep well at Wrigley Field replacing the Green Monster in left field for his home games this year, don't expect him to slug as much for the Cubs. However, he adds a much-needed right-handed threat to their lineup, and will spend lots of time hitting between Michael Busch and Ian Happ or Moisés Ballesteros, giving the Cubs terrific lineup depth and balance.
     
    With Bregman locked up (and locked in, with a full no-trade clause, a source said), the team's infield is in for a shakeup. Dansby Swanson will be the shortstop for at least another year or two, but Matt Shaw has been displaced from the lineup. That could be a temporary change, with Nico Hoerner a free agent after 2026, but it could also prove to be permanent. Bregman is likely to stay at third base. Shaw could slide to second if Hoerner is traded, but the team could also plan to rotate him in as a backup at both second and third (with Hoerner sometimes spelling Swanson at shortstop) and/or to use Bregman as the designated hitter on a semi-regular basis, especially against left-handed pitchers.
     
    The ramifications of the deal will spread out and become clearer in the weeks ahead. For now, what we can say for sure is that the Cubs are serious about challenging the Brewers in the NL Central—and in 2026, they might just overtake them.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Cuzi

    Posted

    Just now, Banks-Williams said:

    Well Bellinger is much better than Bregman both morally and statistically.  

    Thanks to Yankee Stadium.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Banks-Williams said:

    Well if this was his decision, he should be fired.  Bregman’s stats post cheating era are that great.  Plus who wants someone associated with cheating on their team 

    In his last 4 seasons where he accumulated over 2500 PA his WAR is 17. How is that not very good? All those years are post “cheat” years. 

    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Rcal10 said:

    In his last 4 seasons where he accumulated over 2500 PA his WAR is 17. How is that not very good? All those years are post “cheat” years. 

    His batting average and home runs were never close to those of the cheating years: 284-296 v. 242-273 and 31 and 41 v. 26 tops.

    Gjfificifjdej

    Posted

    12 minutes ago, Banks-Williams said:

    Well Bellinger is much better than Bregman both morally and statistically.  

    If a players morals mean anything to you, you’re a pretty bad sports fan. If Hannibal Lecter was an all star at 3B we’d call it an eating disorder 

    • Disagree 1
    • Haha 3
    KCCub

    Posted

    19 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    Why do we get trolls every time the Cubs do something significant? We end up with new posters who are just here to howl at the moon. This is another example. 

    Because it’s an internet sports forum. Happens everywhere. Best way to deal with a troll is to not engage 

    • Like 1
    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    53 minutes ago, Gjfificifjdej said:

    If a players morals mean anything to you, you’re a pretty bad sports fan. If Hannibal Lecter was an all star at 3B we’d call it an eating disorder 

    You know what?  Baseball is a family sport. Parents take their kids to the game so they can admire persons who became successful through hard work and skill.

    But you, you, think it is fine to tell them to admire cheaters?  I’m glad you weren’t my parent. 

    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    53 minutes ago, KCCub said:

    Because it’s an internet sports forum. Happens everywhere. Best way to deal with a troll is to not engage 

     

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Banks-Williams said:

    You know what?  Baseball is a family sport. Parents take their kids to the game so they can admire persons who became successful through hard work and skill.

    But you, you, think it is fine to tell them to admire cheaters?  I’m glad you weren’t my parent. 

    Listen, you have a right to not watch the Cubs if this matters so much to you. 

    I think in the grand scheme of baseball, if you're drawing a line here, then you probably shouldn't have been watching the sport for a while. What Bregman did or was apart of is pretty tame compared to what some of these people are behind the scenes. 

    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

    Listen, you have a right to not watch the Cubs if this matters so much to you. 

    I think in the grand scheme of baseball, if you're drawing a line here, then you probably shouldn't have been watching the sport for a while. What Bregman did or was apart of is pretty tame compared to what some of these people are behind the scenes. 

     

    Victor Reichman

    Posted

    IGNORANT SIGNING ! We have an excellent 3B in Shaw, who is a slightly better fielder, far more speed and low cost. $35 mil a yr till he is 37+ at that level is unconscionable. Don't get me wrong, Bregman is a really good player, but not for 5 yrs/$35 mil when he is 32. Ready to puke. Thankfully, the Bears had a miracle comeback to soften the news of this foolish signing.

    • Disagree 5
    Derwood

    Posted

    I assume this guy didn't watch a single minute of 2025 because Tucker was on the team

    • Love 1
    Banks-Williams

    Posted

    What they do on their own time is their business. At they do on the job — and get caught doing — is my business.  You are right: I can spend my money elsewhere. But if I can get rid of Hoyer for being an idiot, I’ll take that too. 

    It is good to teach kids that you can make a difference.  I don’t teach them that multiple wrongs make a right or make it even okay. 

    Bertz

    Posted

    Cubs now have 11 hitters that Steamer projects to at least a 100 wRC+.  Swanson (98) and Amaya (96) are close and above average for their positions.

    The Cubs also have 10 hitters projected above 100 specifically vs. left handed pitchers as well as 10 vs. right handed pitchers, so there's a strong balance as well.

    Derwood

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Banks-Williams said:

    What they do on their own time is their business. At they do on the job — and get caught doing — is my business.  You are right: I can spend my money elsewhere. But if I can get rid of Hoyer for being an idiot, I’ll take that too. 

    It is good to teach kids that you can make a difference.  I don’t teach them that multiple wrongs make a right or make it even okay. 

    Counterpoint:

    Fuck them kids ? Is it right writen? : r/EnglishLearning

    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
    Gjfificifjdej

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Banks-Williams said:

    You know what?  Baseball is a family sport. Parents take their kids to the game so they can admire persons who became successful through hard work and skill.

    But you, you, think it is fine to tell them to admire cheaters?  I’m glad you weren’t my parent. 

    Most professional athletes are not the kinds of people I would want kids looking up to, this has been the case for my entire life. I wouldn’t be able to enjoy sports if I required the players on my favourite teams to be good human beings. I assume you didn’t watch any games last year because Tucker, another member of the sign stealing Astros was on the team?

    Bertz

    Posted

    Something to keep in mind with adding Bregman to an already full lineup.  The level of health the Cubs got on the position player side last year was extremely fortunate.  And of course health aside if the bench had been less terrible each of those guys probably sits an extra 5-10 games organically.

    Cuzi

    Posted

    13 minutes ago, Derwood said:

    I assume this guy didn't watch a single minute of 2025 because Tucker was on the team

    Tucker was in the minors when the cheating scandal happened. He didn't join the team until the following year.

    Derwood

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

    Tucker was in the minors when the cheating scandal happened. He didn't join the team until the following year.

    Damn, it was that long ago? I was looking at the wrong Astros WS team

    • Like 1
    cl smooth

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Banks-Williams said:

    His batting average and home runs were never close to those of the cheating years: 284-296 v. 242-273 and 31 and 41 v. 26 tops.

    ...are we talking about batting average to gauge if a player is good or not? in the year of our lord 2026?

    Gjfificifjdej

    Posted

    8 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

    Tucker was in the minors when the cheating scandal happened. He didn't join the team until the following year.

    He played games with the Astros in 2018, the investigation concluded the sign stealing operation was still running during that season. 

    Victor Reichman

    Posted

    My comment apparently isn't posting. IGNORANT SIGNING.

    Shaw is actually a better fielder, far more speed, 10 Hr in 2nd half and inexpensive. Bregman is an excellent player, but 32, slowing down, and 5 yrs at $35 yr. is too long and too much, esp. with the possibility of a shutdown in 2027. 

    • Disagree 1
    Derwood

    Posted

    Just now, Victor Reichman said:

    My comment apparently isn't posting. IGNORANT SIGNING.

    Shaw is actually a better fielder, far more speed, 10 Hr in 2nd half and inexpensive. Bregman is an excellent player, but 32, slowing down, and 5 yrs at $35 yr. is too long and too much, esp. with the possibility of a shutdown in 2027. 

    It posted 27 minutes ago, and was wrong then and is wrong now

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    vance_the_cubs_fan

    Posted

    5 hours ago, Rcal10 said:

    I think this also shows we were way more interested in Tucker than the Cubs were. I do think that when he was traded here the plan was for him to love the city and the Cubs sign him long term. They have proved they will pay a guy until 37 years old with this Bregman deal. So, IMO, I think they would have done 10 years with Tucker. I think what happened was the Cubs ended up not really liking Tucker. I have no idea why. But, IMO, they like Bregman’s make up better. What happened last year while the Cubs were trying to get Tucker to love the city was the Cubs decided they didn’t love Tucker. Right or wrong on the Cubs part, I don’t think money or years bothered the Cubs with Tucker. I think Tucker bothered the Cubs. 

    I have heard something that would confirm this. 

    • Like 1
    Cuzi

    Posted (edited)

    20 minutes ago, Gjfificifjdej said:

    He played games with the Astros in 2018, the investigation concluded the sign stealing operation was still running during that season. 

    During "parts" of 2018. The investigation concluded there was no sign stealing taking place during the 2018 playoffs, so at some point during the season they stopped doing it. Tucker played in 28 games in 2018 for the Astros starting in July. He had a .141/.236/.203 batting line for his time on the team that year. If they were still stealing signs by the time he came up, he didn't do a very good job of reading them.

    If you look at their hitters monthly numbers, June kind of stands out for 2018. They all went on a heater that month.

    Edited by Cuzi
    Jason Ross

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, Victor Reichman said:

    My comment apparently isn't posting. IGNORANT SIGNING.

    Shaw is actually a better fielder, far more speed, 10 Hr in 2nd half and inexpensive. Bregman is an excellent player, but 32, slowing down, and 5 yrs at $35 yr. is too long and too much, esp. with the possibility of a shutdown in 2027. 

    Bregman was better in 2025 than he was in 2024 and his wRC+ was the same as it was in 2023. How is that slowing down? 

    Also, it's 5/$30m with the deferrals. If there is a shutdown in 2027, he won't get paid. It's pretty unnecessary to worry about that aspect. 

    • Like 1



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...