Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    BREAKING: Cubs Sign Third Baseman Alex Bregman to Five-Year Deal

    The Cubs got their man this time. With the largest annual average value in team history and the long-term, no-opt-out structure they craved last winter, they’ve signed Alex Bregman.

    Matthew Trueblood
    Image courtesy of © Brian Fluharty-Imagn Imagesan F

    Cubs Video

    The Chicago Cubs and third baseman Alex Bregman have agreed to a five year, $175-million deal, sources confirmed to North Side Baseball. 

    Bregman, who will turn 32 in March, gets the largest AAV in Cubs history, at $35 million. The deal spares the team from having to spread money out into Bregman's late 30s and early 40s, though it almost guarantees that they will surpass the competitive-balance tax threshold for 2026—and perhaps years to come.
     
    In exchange for that, the Cubs get a player who fits their offensive philosophy perfectly. Bregman makes exceptionally good swing decisions and has run superb contact rates almost throughout his career. He lacks high-end bat speed, but creates power by excelling at pulling the ball in the air. He also plays a sturdy third base, and his arrival carries interesting implications for Matt Shaw and Nico Hoerner.
     
    Things were very different for Bregman this year, untethered from the qualifying offer but one year older and with a platform season in which he hit brilliantly early, got hurt, then struggled at times in the second half. Instead of being open to flexible structures and locking in on deals that offered him quick paths back to free agency, Bregman and agent Scott Boras sought a lucrative long-term deal. The Red Sox, who wooed Bregman with a deferral structure and multiple opt-outs last winter, were willing to go longer than the Cubs in terms of years, but refused to pay the high AAV the Cubs offered.
     
    Once he landed Edward Cabrera in a trade earlier this week, Hoyer got permission from ownership to exceed the CBT threshold in order to sign either Bregman or Bo Bichette, a source familiar with the team's plans said. That allowed Chicago to scale up its offer to Bregman, and helped them land the player they hoped would be the capstone to their offseason last year.
     
    In 10 big-league seasons, Bregman has had an on-base percentage under .350 just twice: in 2016 and in 2024. After being in the Astros organization for nearly a decade, he signed with the Red Sox in February and batted .273/.360/.462 in 495 plate appearances. That marked his highest slugging average since 2019, and with the deep well at Wrigley Field replacing the Green Monster in left field for his home games this year, don't expect him to slug as much for the Cubs. However, he adds a much-needed right-handed threat to their lineup, and will spend lots of time hitting between Michael Busch and Ian Happ or Moisés Ballesteros, giving the Cubs terrific lineup depth and balance.
     
    With Bregman locked up (and locked in, with a full no-trade clause, a source said), the team's infield is in for a shakeup. Dansby Swanson will be the shortstop for at least another year or two, but Matt Shaw has been displaced from the lineup. That could be a temporary change, with Nico Hoerner a free agent after 2026, but it could also prove to be permanent. Bregman is likely to stay at third base. Shaw could slide to second if Hoerner is traded, but the team could also plan to rotate him in as a backup at both second and third (with Hoerner sometimes spelling Swanson at shortstop) and/or to use Bregman as the designated hitter on a semi-regular basis, especially against left-handed pitchers.
     
    The ramifications of the deal will spread out and become clearer in the weeks ahead. For now, what we can say for sure is that the Cubs are serious about challenging the Brewers in the NL Central—and in 2026, they might just overtake them.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Rosenthal: $70m of $175m is deferred. 

    • Haha 1
    BigbadB

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

    Rosenthal: $70m of $175m is deferred. 

    Crazy.

    Geographyhater8888

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, Papa Cub said:

    I guess that’s the big question - What does the lineup look like now with Bregman? I agree with your post, but what about this (hear me out) - would they ever consider Bregman as a DH?

    If so, that completely changes the roster too. However, I personally think they play Bregman at 3B and Shaw will become full time utility to learn and grow into potentially covering for Nico after this year. Or they use one of them as trade bait. Either way - it’s exciting to see them being aggressive and trying to build a solid team! 
     

    OF is a concern as far as depth is concerned though. 

    I wonder if there’s a clause in his contract that requires playing X amount of games at third base. DHing vs lefties with Shaw in the lineup and starting at third base seems logical if they keep all 4.

    Bertz

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Jason Ross said:

    Rosenthal: $70m of $175m is deferred. 

    This is hilarious 

    IMO probably says Tom didn't want Jed deferring a bunch of money while his seat was warm.  They deferred a bunch of Heyward's contract long before that was en vogue so i was always skeptical it was a "never" sort of thing.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

    Rosenthal: $70m of $175m is deferred. 

    Wow. First the Cubs act like a major market by targeting a guy and getting him. And now we learn they also did it using deferred money. What a great turn of events. Not sure what was more unexpected. This deal or the Bears comeback. 

    Rcal10

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Bertz said:

    This is hilarious 

    IMO probably says Tom didn't want Jed deferring a bunch of money while his seat was warm.  They deferred a bunch of Heyward's contract long before that was en vogue so i was always skeptical it was a "never" sort of thing.

    It is great news. Wonder if the deferrals will make enough difference to actually keep the Cubs under the LT. Honestly, I don’t care either way. But maybe they do?🤷

    BigbadB

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Rcal10 said:

    It is great news. Wonder if the deferrals will make enough difference to actually keep the Cubs under the LT. Honestly, I don’t care either way. But maybe they do?🤷

    Just imagining that it allows the team to stay intact as it's currently constructed, allows moves at the deadline and keeps the team under the LT.

    17 Seconds

    Posted

    bears, bregman, and bedard. what a great weekend for chicago sports

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    This essentially takes the contract from around 5/$175m to 5/$150m (give or take a few mil).

    Rcal10

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, Jason Ross said:

    This essentially takes the contract from around 5/$175m to 5/$150m (give or take a few mil).

    Cool. It is the few million that matter, if you believe they want to stay under. I honestly am not sure they care. Also, Bregman didn’t have a QO attached, right? Another small win. 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, Rcal10 said:

    Cool. It is the few million that matter, if you believe they want to stay under. I honestly am not sure they care. Also, Bregman didn’t have a QO attached, right? Another small win. 

    No QO attached.

    cl smooth

    Posted (edited)

    edit: double post

    Edited by cl smooth
    cl smooth

    Posted

    9 hours ago, bukie said:

     

    This is an all-timer right here.

    • Like 1
    • Love 1
    UMFan83

    Posted

    I hate this move if it means trading Nico. I think Nico is arguably the Cubs most important position player besides PCA

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    Just now, UMFan83 said:

    I hate this move if it means trading Nico. I think Nico is arguably the Cubs most important position player besides PCA

    I don't think that will be the case. I cannot see a trade that would make any sense.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, cl smooth said:

    This is an all-timer right here.

    Wins the internet. 

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    Just now, Jason Ross said:

    I don't think that will be the case. I cannot see a trade that would make any sense.

    I spent a good bit of time last night trying to come up with something and, for 2026 at least, I couldn't really come up with anything that made sense. There's some, depending on how in need teams are that make sense for the future, i.e. Nico for Ryan Sloan, but nothing that helps now.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Tryptamine said:

    I spent a good bit of time last night trying to come up with something and, for 2026 at least, I couldn't really come up with anything that made sense. There's some, depending on how in need teams are that make sense for the future, i.e. Nico for Ryan Sloan, but nothing that helps now.

    Yep. And I don't think you sign Alex Bregman and then immediately look to ship Hoerner off for future players. So my guess is that the Cubs keep Hoerner for 2026 and then Shaw is the heir apparent. 

    The Cubs can do a lot of damage in the 2027 draft as they will probably be able to get QOs on a lot of their FAs which makes it less likely, IMO, for the Cubs to try to restock the MiLB side of things with a Nico trade. 

    chibears55

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Jason Ross said:

    Rosenthal: $70m of $175m is deferred. 

    So does that mean only 21 is going towards the luxury tax ?  That would put it exactly where we thought they'd offer up the most for someone if the plan was to stay under( approx. 12 under)  and save some for inseason moves

    chibears55

    Posted

    14 minutes ago, UMFan83 said:

    I hate this move if it means trading Nico. I think Nico is arguably the Cubs most important position player besides PCA

    I dont feel like theyre gonna trade Nico, that would be a backwards move with the lineup and weakens it alot.

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    So the deferral news to me is actually kind of a bummer. If they'd already blown past then there's the chance they keep going, but now that we know they haven't, the odds of them making more moves is pretty limited.

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

    So does that mean only 21 is going towards the luxury tax ?  That would put it exactly where we thought they'd offer up the most for someone if the plan was to stay under( approx. 12 under)  and save some for inseason moves

    No. His CBT number will be based on his real-world dollars. To figure out his deferrals it's based on how much money and what year it's being paid. 

    Bregman's AAV isn't known yet, but based on initial reports his deferrals are not super distant, and looks to be paid out shortly after his contract ends. Estimates have brought his CBT number to around $30-$31m. 

    17 Seconds

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

    So the deferral news to me is actually kind of a bummer. If they'd already blown past then there's the chance they keep going, but now that we know they haven't, the odds of them making more moves is pretty limited.

    without the deferral, i think they were much more likely to trade nico to get under than splurge and go way over. the deferral makes me optimistic they're keeping hoerner

    Bertz

    Posted

    I suspect the team is mostly done from here.  Them being a hair under the LT doesn't feel like an accident.  I'd assume the plan is to be basically right at the line entering the season and let the results in July decide if they're comfortable going over by more than a hair or whether they try and drop back down.

    They do have 2 more 40 man spots so they're definitely not done done.  I could see a trade or two to clean up the back of the roster.  Maybe move Rea to save a bit of cash for instance?

    Neuby

    Posted

    11 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

    So the deferral news to me is actually kind of a bummer. If they'd already blown past then there's the chance they keep going, but now that we know they haven't, the odds of them making more moves is pretty limited.

    I was hoping the same. Lots of depth on the market still to grab another cheap reliever, outfielder, bench bat ect for just $$$. At this point you know you're  going over with trade deadline needs anyway.

     

     

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...