Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

I did it for may, and now it's time for June's numbers. First the hitters:

 

Player     AB       Slash Line
Ramirez   102   .265/.330/.461/.791
D Lee      99   .283/.371/.404/.775 
Theriot    94   .309/.369/.340/.709
Soto       88   .250/.327/.420/.747
Fukudome   87   .264/.387/.402/.789
DeRosa     86   .279/.374/.465/.839
Edmonds    72   .319/.419/.667/1.085
Cedeno     42   .214/.267/.238/.505
Fontenot   40   .250/.286/.500/.786
Soriano    39   .256/.318/.538/.857
Patterson  30   .300/.389/.433/.822
Johnson    29   .310/.323/.517/.840
Blanco     25   .240/.269/.240/.509
Hoffpauir  20   .350/.381/.500/.881
Murton     17   .294/.333/.412/.745

 

And the pitchers:

 

Player     IP    ERA   WHIP   K/BB
Lilly     41.2   3.02  1.15  39/17
Dempster  29.2   4.55  1.35   23/8
Marquis   29.1   4.91  1.30  12/12
Gallagher 27.2   4.23  1.37  30/10
Zambrano  25.1   5.68  1.78  13/12
Marshall  11.2   5.40  1.20   12/2
Lieber    11.0   1.64  1.18    6/2
Wood      11.0   0.82  0.91   19/3
Marmol    11.0   7.36  1.27   12/9
Howry     10.0   4.50  1.30    8/1
Cotts      9.0   4.00  1.56   11/5
Wuertz     8.8   2.08  2.08    7/5
Eyre       6.2   8.10  1.95    8/3

Recommended Posts

Old-Timey Member
Posted
wow. i wonder what aramis' numbers would have looked like without that sox series in wrigley. i was assuming he dominated the whole month.
Posted
So most of our pitchers and hitters sucked, yet we went 15-12 in the month? I like it

 

None of the hitters were really great, but none of them(Cedeno's limited time excepted) were terrible. The team hit .279/.352/.432/.784 for the month. Pitching wise, the team had a 201/96 K/BB in just under 300 IP. That's pretty stellar for the entirety of a staff.

Old-Timey Member
Posted
wow. i wonder what aramis' numbers would have looked like without that sox series in wrigley. i was assuming he dominated the whole month.

 

.303/.373/.528/.901 without this past weekend.

 

i meant the other way, what his numbers would have looked like without his tremendous 3 game series in wrigley against the sox.

Posted
wow. i wonder what aramis' numbers would have looked like without that sox series in wrigley. i was assuming he dominated the whole month.

 

.303/.373/.528/.901 without this past weekend.

 

He wanted it without the series at Wrigley, not the series at the Cell.

 

It looks like it was .236/.306/.315. Ouch.

 

3 small stretches really killed him. 1 at the beginning of the month where he was 0 for 13, one in the middle of the month where he was 1 for 12, and finishing the month on an 0 for 14. He was incredibly streaky all month long.

Posted
Not a horrendous month. Not a good one either. 15-12 looks about right with those splits. Soriano and Z probably would have been good for one more win each.
Posted

I think it just goes to show you how incredibly balanced the lineup is. There isn't a single player above a .900 OPS in our lineup.

 

Compare that to the other top 5 offenses:

 

Texas: 1 above 1.000, 2 above .900

Boston: 2 above .900

Philadelpia: 2 above .900

White Sox: 2 above 900

 

The Cubs are still a top offense even without that superstar offensive player because of their balance. Even their worst offensive starter has a .392 OBP right now. There are no parts of the lineup you fear, but there's nobody that you can really say is an easy out or a hole either. When Soriano comes back, you'll have a lineup with 7 guys above .800 (I'm counting the platoon as being above .800, which I think is appropriate right now considering the numbers of Edmonds against right-handers, his numbers with the Cubs, and Johnson's numbers against left-handers), and 1 guy above .750 with a great OBP.

 

Then when you go down to the bench, the top 3 are all above average for their roles (Ward, Fontenot, Johnson/Edmonds), Cedeno is a better hitter than a lot of defensive middle infielders around the league, and Blanco is pretty decent at hitting when compared to other backup catchers in the league. There's not a single spot in the lineup or bench where you can point and say "He's below league average for his role on the team". That's a rare treat.

Posted
Bad month for a lot of guys, especially Marmol towards the end there

 

Jim freakin Edmonds

Jim freakin Hendry

 

I can't believe it worked

Not that big a shock really. As badly as he was doing, there was nowhere to go but up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...