Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

Looking at some stats lines put a few funny things into perspective for me...

 

Maddux was one win away from being tied for the league lead in wins.

 

Zambrano tied for the league lead in wins. He allowed the most walks in all of baseball :shock: He also allowed the second fewest hits per 9 innings in baseball. :D

 

Pierre was the hardest guy in all of baseball to strike out. He was also one of only two players not to miss a game at all last year (Francouer was the other). He also lead the NL in singles, but still had 30 singles less than Ichiro (156 to 186). He also made the most outs in all of baseball with 532. At least you can't say it was from a lack of contact...

 

No 20 game winners in either league.

 

Chuck James had the highest winning percentage in the NL (who the heck is Chuck James?)

 

Solomon Torres appeared in 94 games...and we thought Dusty was bad...

 

The Cubs didn't have anyone finish in the top 10 of the NL in losses (don't know how that happened)

 

Just a few odd facts I hadn't seen yet. Anyone got any others?

Recommended Posts

Posted
Looking at some stats lines put a few funny things into perspective for me...

 

Maddux was one win away from being tied for the league lead in wins.

 

Zambrano tied for the league lead in wins. He allowed the most walks in all of baseball :shock: He also allowed the second fewest hits per 9 innings in baseball. :D

 

Pierre was the hardest guy in all of baseball to strike out. He was also one of only two players not to miss a game at all last year (Francouer was the other). He also lead the NL in singles, but still had 30 singles less than Ichiro (156 to 186). He also made the most outs in all of baseball with 532. At least you can't say it was from a lack of contact...

 

No 20 game winners in either league.

 

Chuck James had the highest winning percentage in the NL (who the heck is Chuck James?)

 

Solomon Torres appeared in 94 games...and we thought Dusty was bad...

 

The Cubs didn't have anyone finish in the top 10 of the NL in losses (don't know how that happened)

 

Just a few odd facts I hadn't seen yet. Anyone got any others?

 

 

Interesting...Pierre hardest guy to strike out in the majors is hard to believe..But he only fanned 38 times..He dosent know how to work the count but he does always make contact.Unfortuantley, they are all slap grounders to second base.Just thinking, compare the strikeout rate of Pierre to Soriano, 38 to 160..Wow that is a big difference,but your getting wayy more production in RBI's and HR's with Soriano in the leadoff spot

Posted
There is never a reason for the opposing pitcher to waste so many pitches attempting to strike out Juan Pierre. He will rarely hurt you with a bat, so you're better off throwing fastballs right down broadway and let him bounce out to the 2b.
Posted
There is never a reason for the opposing pitcher to waste so many pitches attempting to strike out Juan Pierre. He will rarely hurt you with a bat, so you're better off throwing fastballs right down broadway and let him bounce out to the 2b.

 

Exactly. There's no risk of him driving the ball, so why waste pitches? Additionally, he'll chase the wasted pitches and drive those into the ground.

Posted

Chuck James had the highest winning percentage in the NL (who the heck is Chuck James?)

An Atlanta pitcher that saved my fantasy team. Rook they brought up, could be a sleeper next year.

 

The Cubs didn't have anyone finish in the top 10 of the NL in losses (don't know how that happened)

Most of the time, they probably didn't get a decision due to lack of innings pitched, plus most were brought up mid season. Marshall went down due to injury.

Posted

Most of the time, they probably didn't get a decision due to lack of innings pitched, plus most were brought up mid season. Marshall went down due to injury.

 

For your first point, it doesn't matter how many innings were pitched. If they got pulled after 3 innings and were losing it's still a loss. You need to pitch 5 for a win, but there's no minimum for a loss.

 

Unless I'm understanding your point incorrectly.

Posted

Most of the time, they probably didn't get a decision due to lack of innings pitched, plus most were brought up mid season. Marshall went down due to injury.

 

For your first point, it doesn't matter how many innings were pitched. If they got pulled after 3 innings and were losing it's still a loss. You need to pitch 5 for a win, but there's no minimum for a loss.

 

Unless I'm understanding your point incorrectly.

 

you have obviously forgotten how the mighty cubs offense routinely bailed them out.

Posted
There is never a reason for the opposing pitcher to waste so many pitches attempting to strike out Juan Pierre. He will rarely hurt you with a bat, so you're better off throwing fastballs right down broadway and let him bounce out to the 2b.

 

Exactly. There's no risk of him driving the ball, so why waste pitches? Additionally, he'll chase the wasted pitches and drive those into the ground.

 

As a leadoff hitter with over 250 PA only Randy Winn edged him out for least amount of p/pa (by .01).

Posted

 

An Atlanta pitcher that saved my fantasy team. Rook they brought up, could be a sleeper next year.

 

 

Hes one of the best (if not the best) Braves pitching prospects. Hes pretty interesting...a huge flyball pitcher with a really good K rate. Hes been uber studly in the minors, but thats due to a low HR rate that last year showed was not sustainable in the majors. It also was due to crazy low hit rates. Hes not going to be able to keep those up, but he should be well below league average in H/9 and BABIP given all the fly balls.

Posted

Most of the time, they probably didn't get a decision due to lack of innings pitched, plus most were brought up mid season. Marshall went down due to injury.

 

For your first point, it doesn't matter how many innings were pitched. If they got pulled after 3 innings and were losing it's still a loss. You need to pitch 5 for a win, but there's no minimum for a loss.

 

Unless I'm understanding your point incorrectly.

Nope you've nailed me. For some reason I thought you had to pitch 3 innings to qualify for a loss.

Posted

Something I noticed recently that I thought was kind of odd. (I don't know if odd is the correct term, maybe bizarre, or better yet whacked)

 

In 2006 the Cubs finished with 66 wins (yes we ALL know this). With 66 wins they finished 17.5 games out of first place.

 

In 2004 the Cubs won 89 games. They finished 16 games out of first.

 

89 Victories in 2006 would have won the division by 6 games.

 

Baseball is a funny game. :?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...