Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Yikes. I just read that and came here to post it as well. I disagree with most of what Sullivan said.

 

1. I think letting Ramirez walk if he opts-out is a huge mistake. The guy started off slow this year. He's still better (and younger) than Lowell or anyone else the Cubs are going to find off the scrap heap.

 

2. I don't see a reason to push Pierre into re-signing now (or ever). I might offer him arbitration, but that's it. I'm not that high on Matthews Jr. either, but wouldn't be against that move for the right price. If I don't see a viable CFer available that fits my needs, I'd call up Pie and upgrade elsewhere.

 

3. On Wood; I'd offer him a small (incentive-based) contract. I don't see the obsession with making Wood "make a decision now".

 

4. Mussina is 38 years old. We don't really need another Maddux-esque signing at this point. I think his contract demands will exceed what he can provide at this point. The rotation that Sullivan suggests isn't very impressive at all.

 

5. IMO, putting Dempster into the rotation is a HORRIBLE idea. I would not consider it.

 

6. I'm not high on Sheffield at this point. His age is catching up with him health-wise. I think there are better alternatives via trade or signing Soriano to play 2B. If he wants to stay in LF, Hendry should at least consider moving Jock to CF (I know that won't happen though). Murton moves to RF in that scenario. Catalanotto would also be high on my wish list if I were Hendry.

Posted
Sullivan must be re-signing Baker with that lineup. Bringing in Durham, Mussina, Lowell, etc. makes the team's average age about 35. What happened to the youth movement? Also, he's assuming that these older free agents will be glad to come here on a one or two year contract and hold a spot for a prospect. That's probably not going to happen. Finally, Dempster in the rotation is scary.
Posted
I don't really think that his lineup is possible, but I wouldn't be all that dissapointed with it, and it's probably good enough to win the division. I for one would just like to see Hendry address real problems.
Posted
If you aren't going to sign Pierre and ARAM there should be plenty of money to sign either Lee or Soriano.
Posted
If you aren't going to sign Pierre and ARAM there should be plenty of money to sign either Lee or Soriano.

 

Or at least enough to offer almost enough, like we did for Furcal and Beltran.

Posted
If you aren't going to sign Pierre and ARAM there should be plenty of money to sign either Lee or Soriano.

 

Or at least enough to offer almost enough, like we did for Furcal and Beltran.

 

Right! We always place 2nd or 3rd in the Free Agent hunt every year.

Posted
If you aren't going to sign Pierre and ARAM there should be plenty of money to sign either Lee or Soriano.

 

Or at least enough to offer almost enough, like we did for Furcal and Beltran.

 

Right! We always place 2nd or 3rd in the Free Agent hunt every year.

 

Unless Jeff Blauser is out there.

Posted

My initial reaction to this was not positive, but then I saw these 06' stats:

 

Durham: .295 .363 .523

 

So now I think we should get Durham, keep ARam, and get either Sheff or Andruw Jones.

Posted
My initial reaction to this was not positive, but then I saw these 06' stats:

 

Durham: .295 .363 .523

 

So now I think we should get Durham, keep ARam, and get either Sheff or Andruw Jones.

 

Someone else mentioned Durham a month or so ago and I laughed until I checked out his stats. It's very impressive!

Posted
My initial reaction to this was not positive, but then I saw these 06' stats:

 

Durham: .295 .363 .523

 

So now I think we should get Durham, keep ARam, and get either Sheff or Andruw Jones.

 

Someone else mentioned Durham a month or so ago and I laughed until I checked out his stats. It's very impressive!

 

The only thing that bothers me about Ray is that he will be 35 next year and therefore its more likely than not that this year's production won't be sustained. That said, if he were willing to take a two year deal for 10 mill, I'd have to think long and hard about it.

Posted
My initial reaction to this was not positive, but then I saw these 06' stats:

 

Durham: .295 .363 .523

 

So now I think we should get Durham, keep ARam, and get either Sheff or Andruw Jones.

 

Someone else mentioned Durham a month or so ago and I laughed until I checked out his stats. It's very impressive!

 

My biggest beef with Sullivan's plan isn't the Durham acquisition. The rotation he suggests is terrible. Also, replacing Ramirez with Lowell is a big mistake, IMO (not to mention that Lowell likely has no interest in being a stopgap). Lastly, I'm not interested in Sheffield unless his price tag is much smaller than I expect it to be.

Posted
My initial reaction to this was not positive, but then I saw these 06' stats:

 

Durham: .295 .363 .523

 

So now I think we should get Durham, keep ARam, and get either Sheff or Andruw Jones.

 

Someone else mentioned Durham a month or so ago and I laughed until I checked out his stats. It's very impressive!

 

My biggest beef with Sullivan's plan isn't the Durham acquisition. The rotation he suggests is terrible. Also, replacing Ramirez with Lowell is a big mistake, IMO (not to mention that Lowell likely has no interest in being a stopgap). Lastly, I'm not interested in Sheffield unless his price tag is much smaller than I expect it to be.

 

Agreed on all counts. I like Sheff's production, but I can't imagine that he will take anything less than a two year contract for a minimum of 10 million per. And teh only way I'd be comfortable with slotting Lowell in for ARam is if we replace Pierre with Andruw Jones. Under that hyopthetical scenario, the lineup would like this:

 

Durham

Murton

Lee

A Jones

Barrett

Lowell

J. Jones

Izturis

 

Not the lineup that I'd prefer (I'd rather keep ARam and get Andruw), but not too shabby either.

Posted

I like the idea of getting Sheffield. I'd prefer that getting him would push Jones to CF however.

 

Signing Durham is interesting. It's not a bad move at the right price. I'd prefer to pursue a trade for Giles first.

 

The Cubs have a lot of internal options for the rotation. Other than signing Schmidt or Zito, I don't see the need to go get pitching.

 

I don't advocate letting Ramirez walk at all. If he walks, I'd almost think we should focus on rebuilding rather than picking up Sheffield, Durham, Mussina types.

Posted
I like the idea of getting Sheffield. I'd prefer that getting him would push Jones to CF however.

 

Signing Durham is interesting. It's not a bad move at the right price. I'd prefer to pursue a trade for Giles first.

 

The Cubs have a lot of internal options for the rotation. Other than signing Schmidt or Zito, I don't see the need to go get pitching.

 

I don't advocate letting Ramirez walk at all. If he walks, I'd almost think we should focus on rebuilding rather than picking up Sheffield, Durham, Mussina types.

 

I disagree...You need (at least) another Vet starter.

Posted

Letting Ramirez walk is not an option in my opinion. When Hendry didn't move him at the deadline for prospects, that indicated to me that he was going to re-negotiate his deal.

 

Losing Ramirez's production without getting anything in return (especially given the Cubs inability to spend the left-over dollars wisely) would be suicide.

Posted
Letting Ramirez walk is not an option in my opinion. When Hendry didn't move him at the deadline for prospects, that indicated to me that he was going to re-negotiate his deal.

 

Losing Ramirez's production without getting anything in return (especially given the Cubs inability to spend the left-over dollars wisely) would be suicide.

 

Great point! It would be terrible to lose him and get nothing out of it.

Posted
Letting Ramirez walk is not an option in my opinion. When Hendry didn't move him at the deadline for prospects, that indicated to me that he was going to re-negotiate his deal.

 

Losing Ramirez's production without getting anything in return (especially given the Cubs inability to spend the left-over dollars wisely) would be suicide.

 

Don't worry, we'll just move Barrett to left field and get a defensive catcher. World Series champs in '07.

Posted

Fun with PECOTA:

 

2007 VORP predictions from ’06 PECOTA

 

1. Gary Matthews Jr. CF (age 32, 5.7 VORP)

2. Ray Durham 2B (age 35, 19.5 VORP)

3. Derrek Lee 1B (age 31, 40.3 VORP)

4. Gary Sheffield RF (age 38, 34.8 VORP)

5. Michael Barrett C (age 30, 13.3 VORP)

6. Mike Lowell 3B (age 33, 12.4 VORP)

7. Jacque Jones LF (age 32, 6.1 VORP)

8. Cesar Izturis SS (age 27, 6.3 VORP)

 

Total projected 2007 VORP above: 138.4

 

 

Last year's 2006 projection: 164.9 VORP (Pierre, Walker, Lee, Aramis, Jones, Murton , Barrett, Cedeno)

 

In theory, the offense of team Sullivan is 2.5 wins worse than this year's lineup was supposed to be.

 

However, it may be better than the current 2006 team VORP (all players) of 93.8, currently good for 26/30 in the league.

Posted
I like Durham, and would definitely advocate getting him as a stopgap. Keeps the Cubs from rushing Patterson, who is close but not there yet (although he has been tearing up AAA ball in very limited time, so he may be closer than suspected), but doesn't block him long-term. I'd offer a one year deal for decent money, and hopefully nobody's dumb enough to offer him a long-term deal. He'd eliminate the "need" to sign a stereotypical leadoff guy (pierre, roberts) for CF, giving the Cubs better options. I would then move Jones to CF and shoot for a big bat to play LF or RF, keeping Murton at the other position (RF seems more feasible, naturally). Alternately, making a play for either Giles or A. Jones from ATL, since both seem to be available in the right deal. And it is imperative to keep Ramirez.
Posted
I like Durham, and would definitely advocate getting him as a stopgap. Keeps the Cubs from rushing Patterson, who is close but not there yet (although he has been tearing up AAA ball in very limited time, so he may be closer than suspected), but doesn't block him long-term. I'd offer a one year deal for decent money, and hopefully nobody's dumb enough to offer him a long-term deal. He'd eliminate the "need" to sign a stereotypical leadoff guy (pierre, roberts) for CF, giving the Cubs better options. I would then move Jones to CF and shoot for a big bat to play LF or RF, keeping Murton at the other position (RF seems more feasible, naturally). Alternately, making a play for either Giles or A. Jones from ATL, since both seem to be available in the right deal. And it is imperative to keep Ramirez.

 

If they got A. Jones, what do we do with our own Jock Jones?

Posted
With Sullivan's revamp, you had better hope that they stay healthy. With Sheffield, Mussina, Durham, and Lowell in addition to Prior and Wood on the team, we might lead the league in players going to the DL.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...