Levine: Alex Bregman Open to Short-Term Deals, Cubs Have Talked to Scott Boras About It

1 hour ago, Rcal10 said:

Really? You are the second person to think Nico for Clarke Schmidt is a hard no from the Cubs. What am I missing? I feel Cuzi loved Schmidt. Haven’t heard from him. Just curious, what does surplus value show these guys at? I am not saying you are wrong, I might be. I just thought Schmidt was more valuable. Keep in mind, if the Cubs got Bregman, I would rather no trade is made. I am only saying if one HAD to be made I thought this was fair. 

It would be trading 2 years of a 4 WAR player on a good contract for 3 years of a 2 WAR player.  Schmidt is an average pitcher.

3 minutes ago, squally1313 said:

Two points, one on each side:

2. The projections for Schmidt as shown above show 108 innings pitched, and I'm not totally sure what drives that number, but I was under the impression it was some sort of dynamic playing time projection analysis where he is coming in as the 5th/6th starter in the current Yankees rotation and that's just what normal fringe starters usually get in terms of innings. He threw 96 total last year and 159 in 2023 so he's capable of more. Basically what I'm saying if he got traded to the White Sox tomorrow he'd be their opening day starter, I would imagine his innings would go up (to that 150 IP number, maybe), and I would then imagine his projected fWAR would increase because I can't imagine his rate stats would take too much of a hit, right? Said another way, the rate stats give every pitcher some miniscule amount of projected fWAR per inning, and then it gets multiplied by how much they think he's going to play, which is somewhat a factor of the roster he's on. But I might be thinking about that wrong. 

This is true. ZiPS DC (Factors innings/playing time on current depth chart/team context) has him at 132 IP this season for the Yankees at 2 fWAR. Still the same underlying projected numbers, just more innings equaling more fWAR.

At the end of the day, all Fangraphs projection systems have him projected just under a 4 ERA, which is Jamo like, but if we're looking for a game 2 playoff starter with our one major SP move, then I'm hoping we are aiming higher. 

5 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

So if I am reading this right you are suggesting if Schmidt did throw 160 innings his value might be close to Nico. Is this correct? 

He put up 159 IP in 2023 at 2 fWAR (4.64 ERA, 4.33 xERA, 4.36 xFIP). The lack of track record is really the concern here e.g. can he go 150+ IP 3 consecutive years and maintain his xERA of 3.78 that he had last season in only 85 IP or is it more likely to be around 4.5 when he's putting up that many IP. 

Something worth noting: teams don't make formal offers until a deal is almost done.  So now we know the Cubs and Astros have done so.

I'd be shocked if this isn't resolved in the next 48 hours. 

Cross Moncada off the list for the bench. We must really think we have a shot at Bregman.

The longer this drags on the more likely i think he returns to the astros and tries FA again next year

1 hour ago, Dfan25 said:

 

We're screwed.  With around 32m left minus about 8m in space what is plan B?

Could always try to get Robertson on a good deal, maybe 10m.  Or some kind of trade, even eating salary for a year

I’ve seen this play out too often. Cubs are going to come away with MAYBE Canha and that will be it. Ricketts will pocket $25M of money he didn’t spend and then the off season will be complete. And they won’t use it to extend Tucker and probably won’t used it if they add at the trade deadline. Another off season tease.  

Is Arenado an option here?  Would he even be worth the bother?

9 minutes ago, Stratos said:

Is Arenado an option here?  Would he even be worth the bother?

No. Would rather just play Shaw. 

I don’t care that they don’t end up with Bregman. What I do care about is all the penny pinching because they fell for Bregman using them to try to get a better off elsewhere. They should have just gotten a better pitcher than Rea, maybe signed Robinson and probably should have signed Grichik and Moncada. They wouldn’t have enough for all of those moves, but at least a few. Now guys are signed and they have money and nothing to spend it on. And even that would be ok if they used it to extend Tucker. But I have no faith they will do that either. They had a chance to be a clear favorite for this division. They may still win it, but they did waste an opportunity to be even better. 

41 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

I’ve seen this play out too often. Cubs are going to come away with MAYBE Canha and that will be it. Ricketts will pocket $25M of money he didn’t spend and then the off season will be complete. And they won’t use it to extend Tucker and probably won’t used it if they add at the trade deadline. Another off season tease.  

1. When have you seen this play out 'too often'?

2. We all read the second paragraph of that tweet right?

3. Does the season start tomorrow?

44 minutes ago, Randall Simon said:

No. Would rather just play Shaw. 

I think he's owed the equivalent of 60m over the next 3 years by the Cards.  A bunch of it deferred through 2041 lol

25 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

I don’t care that they don’t end up with Bregman. What I do care about is all the penny pinching because they fell for Bregman using them to try to get a better off elsewhere. They should have just gotten a better pitcher than Rea, maybe signed Robinson and probably should have signed Grichik and Moncada. They wouldn’t have enough for all of those moves, but at least a few. Now guys are signed and they have money and nothing to spend it on. And even that would be ok if they used it to extend Tucker. But I have no faith they will do that either. They had a chance to be a clear favorite for this division. They may still win it, but they did waste an opportunity to be even better. 

Robertson, Jansen, Pivetta, Canha, Turner etc still left out there, plus Bregman and a bunch of relievers and bench guys.  If Pivetta comes down enough he'd be worth the QO pick.  I have no issues with Rea for depth at 5m, that's worth the 1 WAR or so he can give.

We have about 22-24 left to spend, maybe a bit more, and no less than 4 solid options out there that can improve the team.

I dont have a problem trading Nico and his remaining 2 yrs on his deal if they sign Bregman, but I dont want prospects for Nico either, I prefer if they do trade him, they get at least a middle of the rotation type SP for him or better if they have to add a prospect.

The Cubs lineup could use a change and added punch outside of just adding Tucker and Shaw.

Adding both Bregman and Tucker to the middle of the lineup would or should add alot of punch to the order and would also help guys like Swanson, Happ, and Suzuki get better pitches to hit with those 2 protecting them.

To not meet in the middle seems odd on both his part and the Cubs. Moncada's already banked over $100M in his career at age 29 before todays deal.

It's 2025.  Having ~$20M left over in your baseball budget is hardly some Brewster's Millions style challenge.

This whole thing has me confused. The astros have to have a better offer than us. It seems they’re even giving him the years he wants as well. I can’t imagine his market will improve that dramatically when he’s a year older. You’d imagine there’s a chance the tigers are still higher and he just doesn’t want to go there? 

29 minutes ago, ToolDRT said:

This whole thing has me confused. The astros have to have a better offer than us. It seems they’re even giving him the years he wants as well. I can’t imagine his market will improve that dramatically when he’s a year older. You’d imagine there’s a chance the tigers are still higher and he just doesn’t want to go there? 

The part I can mostly suss out is that the Astros original deal was 6/$156m, and he's made $30m annually the last two years, so I think he at least miffed (offended?) by their offer being a pay decrease. Also saw something about him wanting to beat Devers in AAV, who is making $31.3m or so. There was an improved offer today, who knows what that means, in the same report it says it's still not good enough. Then there's also the matter of how much of it is deferred. If it's 6/$200 but paid out $10m at a time over the next 20 years, that's probably not going to do it either.

I can't imagine the Cubs are offering AAV much higher than that Devers deal. Past that, even with a Hoerner tradea you still end up a little tight. But something like 4 years, $100m, with the actual cash split being $40m in year one and then $20m the next three years, gives him an attractive payday with the opt-out chance to go establish himself as the top AAV 3B next offseason. 

1 hour ago, ToolDRT said:

This whole thing has me confused. The astros have to have a better offer than us. It seems they’re even giving him the years he wants as well. I can’t imagine his market will improve that dramatically when he’s a year older. You’d imagine there’s a chance the tigers are still higher and he just doesn’t want to go there? 

Reminder that alleged "offers" as rumors can just be Boras planting lies used for leverage in negotiation.  It could also be that nobody is offering more than 4 or 5 years at this point, or Astros have moved on.

We don't know what to believe so everything is with a grain of salt.

9 hours ago, squally1313 said:

1. When have you seen this play out 'too often'?

2. We all read the second paragraph of that tweet right?

3. Does the season start tomorrow?

1 Cubs fall short of an opportunity to be clear favorites in division by not doing enough in the off season. 
2. I read the tweet. Cubs aren’t getting Bregman. And I am fine with that anyway. What I wish they did was already have better talent in the team then what they have. Instead of low salary dumpster dive, back end guys like Morgan, Thielbar, Rea, Brasier, Berti, Lopez, any number of pen arms they signed hoping to catch lightening in a bottle, trade for or sign some better players. 
3. yes, there is time left. And if he does do more I will acknowledge my overreaction. But what I see is maybe a bat added for the bench and we go to spring training after a good offseason that could have taken a bigger step and been a great off season. But, hey, at least Ricketts saved $25M. 
NOTE: my post was more out of frustration that guys are signing and we aren’t getting them. I honestly don’t think we are getting Bregman. So I want a better starting pitcher and a good bench. The issue with a staring pitcher is most likely it has to come via trade. And you need another team for that. I am not sure I see that happening. 

Im just thinking here but maybe Bregman just dont want to go back to Houston or play in Detroit and just waiting on the Cubs who just may be trying to get a trade done for Nico before finalizing a deal with Bregman. 

Maybe Tucker and Pressly has convinced him to join them in Chicago 🤷‍♂️

Moving Nico who is owed 11.5 this season and add someone like Michael King who owed 4 mil this season,  can give the Cubs and extra 7.5 towards using on Bregman and or maybe towards another reliever. 

It possible they can be trying get a 3rd team involved on this

1 hour ago, Rcal10 said:

What I wish they did was already have better talent in the team then what they have. Instead of low salary dumpster dive, back end guys like Morgan, Thielbar, Rea, Brasier, Berti, Lopez, any number of pen arms they signed hoping to catch lightening in a bottle, trade for or sign some better players. 

Sometimes I think Hoyer does this because it gives their prospects added time in Iowa to get ready before bringing them up, and it easier to just release the dumpster dives or keep them in Iowa for depth because the cost is low.

17 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

Im just thinking here but maybe Bregman just dont want to go back to Houston or play in Detroit and just waiting on the Cubs who just may be trying to get a trade done for Nico before finalizing a deal with Bregman. 

Maybe Tucker and Pressly has convinced him to join them in Chicago 🤷‍♂️

Moving Nico who is owed 11.5 this season and add someone like Michael King who owed 4 mil this season,  can give the Cubs and extra 7.5 towards using on Bregman and or maybe towards another reliever. 

It possible they can be trying get a 3rd team involved on this

 

It wouldn't be King, because the Pads are known to be trying to dump salary. A Nico for King swap would result in SD adding salary, which they would not agree to.  

33 minutes ago, chibears55 said:

Im just thinking here but maybe Bregman just dont want to go back to Houston or play in Detroit and just waiting on the Cubs who just may be trying to get a trade done for Nico before finalizing a deal with Bregman. 

Maybe Tucker and Pressly has convinced him to join them in Chicago 🤷‍♂️

Moving Nico who is owed 11.5 this season and add someone like Michael King who owed 4 mil this season,  can give the Cubs and extra 7.5 towards using on Bregman and or maybe towards another reliever. 

It possible they can be trying get a 3rd team involved on this

 

Couple things here.

Bregman wants the best deal period. I dont think he ends up here, but if he does it will because the Cubs are offering more money in the short term and a chance to opt out.

I believe Micheal Kings AAV will count for 7.75  this year. Not 4.

The Padres want to shed salary. That's the main reason they'd be moving King. That trade would do the opposite.