Wow. Where did that come from? Where did what come from? I just don't care for Goldstein's interpretation of the whole Prior/Wood dynamic. He's projecting, which I think, sometimes, particular stat-heads are wont to do. It's this whole us vs. them fallacy -- nouveau, enlightened, 21st century baseball paragons vs. old, crusty, chaw-spittin', flat-earth baseball men and the sychophantic sports reporters who suck on their every word. Sure, you'll find "old school baseball guys" that seem to live down to the stereotype; but in general, I find it to be a false dichotomy, both obnoxious and unhelpful. Yet there is always this temptation to set up this kind of fatted straw man and parade him around in all his backwardness and pig-ignorance as a means of derision and ridicule. I am probably (well, I know) I am giving way too much credit to these Prior-is-a-wuss critics, but since I tend to come from a stat-geek perspective (all the way back to the old Bill James Abstracts and, later, to the old rec.sport.baseball usenet days when Baseball Prospectus was pretty much birthed by a few newsgroup regulars), I find this kind of behavior annoying. Of course now I am projecting and have probably been just as guilty of objectionable snark, but I calls 'em as I sees 'em.